Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Gill and Company Ltd.

Decided On : Apr-04-1973

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 44(1, Section 2(o, Section 2(o, Section 2(o, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 2(o

PERSON: Misc, M.P. v. Gill, Misc, Misc, Nirnaya, Kurnool v. Commercial Tax

CARDINAL: 147, 147, 146, 1962.2, 23,104, two, 235, one, Two, two, two, 1958.8, 29, 639, 11, 1958.11

DATE: 1969, 1969, 1958, 1969, 1956, 1st April, 1966, 31st March, 1958, 19583, 1958, 1970, 1972, 1960

ORG: Sales Tax, Co. Private Ltd., the Central Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax, Sales Tax, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the Commissioner of Sales Tax, the Board of Revenue, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, follows:'Sale, Government Advocate, Government Advocate, Government Advocate, Court, Sales Tax, M.P. v. Maratha Syndicate Pvt. Ltd., Bisbambhar Dayal, C.J., Division Bench, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, Court, Birla Jute, Sales Tax, Government Advocate, the Supreme Court, Tungabhadra Industries Ltd., Kuinool, the Supreme Court, Government Advocate, the Supreme Court, Lordships, the Board of Revenue, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, the Board of Revenue

GPE: Ujjain, S.C., rebuttal.10

ORDINAL: Firstly, secondly

PRODUCT: 827

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //