Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Gill and Company Ltd.
Decided On : Apr-04-1973
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 44(1, Section 2(o, Section 2(o, Section 2(o, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 2(o
PERSON: Misc, M.P. v. Gill, Misc, Misc, Nirnaya, Kurnool v. Commercial Tax
CARDINAL: 147, 147, 146, 1962.2, 23,104, two, 235, one, Two, two, two, 1958.8, 29, 639, 11, 1958.11
DATE: 1969, 1969, 1958, 1969, 1956, 1st April, 1966, 31st March, 1958, 19583, 1958, 1970, 1972, 1960
ORG: Sales Tax, Co. Private Ltd., the Central Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax, Sales Tax, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the Commissioner of Sales Tax, the Board of Revenue, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, follows:'Sale, Government Advocate, Government Advocate, Government Advocate, Court, Sales Tax, M.P. v. Maratha Syndicate Pvt. Ltd., Bisbambhar Dayal, C.J., Division Bench, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, Court, Birla Jute, Sales Tax, Government Advocate, the Supreme Court, Tungabhadra Industries Ltd., Kuinool, the Supreme Court, Government Advocate, the Supreme Court, Lordships, the Board of Revenue, the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, the Board of Revenue
GPE: Ujjain, S.C., rebuttal.10
ORDINAL: Firstly, secondly
PRODUCT: 827