Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rajendra Rathor and anr. Vs. Madhya Pradesh Stock Exchange and ors.

Decided On : Sep-14-1999

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Article 12, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2, Article 12, Article 12, Article 226, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Chapter III, Constitution, Article 226, Article 12, Article 32, Article 226, Article 226, Article 12, Article 12, Article 32, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226, Article 12, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Section 5, Section 6, Section 9.18, Section 30, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226

PERSON: B.A. Khan, J.1, W. P. No., Mathur, Rakesh Gupta v. Hyderabad Stock Exchange Ltd., Sejal, Rege, Amathalal Gandhi v. Union, P. Srinivasan, Minu Mathew, Dwarka Nath v. ITO, Praga Tools Corporation, Sadguru Shree Muktajee, Suvarna Jayanti, V.R. Rudani, Praga Tools', de Smith, Ramana Dayaram Shetty, Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, Bench

ORG: the M. P. Stock Exchange, State, the Central Government, State, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, the Central Government, Government, State, J.P., State of, Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1993 SC, Dalai v. Stock Exchange, AIR, State, the 'State', the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, High Courts, State, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, Rohtas industries Ltd., Rohtas Industries Staff Union, the High Courts, State, SC, AIR 1989, Judicial Review of Administrative Act, J.P., State of Andhra Pradesh, Air India Statutory Corporation, United Labour Union, State, State, High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, International Airports Authority of India, Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd., Brojo Nath Ganguly, State, the Central Government, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, Central Government, Government, The Central Government, the Central Government, the Stock Exchange, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, the Central Government, Sections, the Securities Contracts (Regulations) Rules, the Central Government, the Central Government, Division Bench, Andhra Pradesh High Courts, Kerala High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Central Government

CARDINAL: Four, 493, three, 1961]1SCR191, 83, 794, 420, 1969)IILLJ479SC, 1976)ILLJ274SC, 226, 39, 540, 1993]1SCR594, 1997)ILLJ1113SC, 1981)ILLJ103SC, 1986)IILLJ171SC, three, 13, Three, two

DATE: 1928, 1993, 1410, 1995, 1956, support.5, 1995, 1995, the years, 1965]57ITR349(SC, 1989)IILLJ324SC, 1969, '10, '11, 1956, annual, 11 12, 1957, annual

GPE: Krishnan, Bombay, Madhubhai, Krishnan, china, Kerala

NORP: R., Satish, Mandamus, Mandamus, Satish

PRODUCT: Articles 12

WORK_OF_ART: 4th edition

FAC: Ajay Hasia v., Sections 4

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //