Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Rajendra Rathor and anr. Vs. Madhya Pradesh Stock Exchange and ors.
Decided On : Sep-14-1999
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Article 12, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2, Article 12, Article 12, Article 226, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Chapter III, Constitution, Article 226, Article 12, Article 32, Article 226, Article 226, Article 12, Article 12, Article 32, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226, Article 12, Article 12, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226, Section 5, Section 6, Section 9.18, Section 30, Article 226, Article 12, Article 226
PERSON: B.A. Khan, J.1, W. P. No., Mathur, Rakesh Gupta v. Hyderabad Stock Exchange Ltd., Sejal, Rege, Amathalal Gandhi v. Union, P. Srinivasan, Minu Mathew, Dwarka Nath v. ITO, Praga Tools Corporation, Sadguru Shree Muktajee, Suvarna Jayanti, V.R. Rudani, Praga Tools', de Smith, Ramana Dayaram Shetty, Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, Bench
ORG: the M. P. Stock Exchange, State, the Central Government, State, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, the Central Government, Government, State, J.P., State of, Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1993 SC, Dalai v. Stock Exchange, AIR, State, the 'State', the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, High Courts, State, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, Rohtas industries Ltd., Rohtas Industries Staff Union, the High Courts, State, SC, AIR 1989, Judicial Review of Administrative Act, J.P., State of Andhra Pradesh, Air India Statutory Corporation, United Labour Union, State, State, High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, International Airports Authority of India, Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd., Brojo Nath Ganguly, State, the Central Government, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, Central Government, Government, The Central Government, the Central Government, the Stock Exchange, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, the Central Government, Sections, the Securities Contracts (Regulations) Rules, the Central Government, the Central Government, Division Bench, Andhra Pradesh High Courts, Kerala High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Central Government
CARDINAL: Four, 493, three, 1961]1SCR191, 83, 794, 420, 1969)IILLJ479SC, 1976)ILLJ274SC, 226, 39, 540, 1993]1SCR594, 1997)ILLJ1113SC, 1981)ILLJ103SC, 1986)IILLJ171SC, three, 13, Three, two
DATE: 1928, 1993, 1410, 1995, 1956, support.5, 1995, 1995, the years, 1965]57ITR349(SC, 1989)IILLJ324SC, 1969, '10, '11, 1956, annual, 11 12, 1957, annual
GPE: Krishnan, Bombay, Madhubhai, Krishnan, china, Kerala
NORP: R., Satish, Mandamus, Mandamus, Satish
PRODUCT: Articles 12
WORK_OF_ART: 4th edition
FAC: Ajay Hasia v., Sections 4