T.C. Sharma Vs. I.G. of Prisons and ors.

Decided On : Apr-21-1975

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, Rule 34, Rule 10, Rule 29, Rule 29, Constitutional, Constitution, the Rule of Business, Constitutional, Constitutional, Constitutional, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitutional, Constitution, Rule 29, Rule 29, Article 311 of the Constitution, Rule 16, Rule 16, Rule 4, Rule 14, Rule 14, Rule 14, Section 99, the People Act, Act 27 of 1957, Rule 14, Article 20(2, Constitution, Article 20(2, Article 20(2, Constitution

GPE: Singh, Clause, Singh v. State of Punjab, Kammins Ballrooms, service.10

NORP: J.1, Rules

DATE: 1lth October, 1974, 1st June, 1972, November, 1973, three years, 30th March, 1974, 11th October, 1974, 15th October, 1974, Rule 29, 1966, six months of the date, Rule 14, 1st March, 1974, 1897, Rule 14', 1970, 1951, three years

ORG: the Inspector General of Prisons, the Government of Madhya Pradesh, Alirajpur, the Inspector General of Prisons, the Madhya Pradesh Civil Service, Control and Appeal) Rules, the State Government, Government, may-(a, or(d, Government, Government, him.4, the Inspector General of Prisons, the Inspector-General of Prisons, the State Government, The State Government ii, the Inspector-General of Prisons, the Inspector General of Prisons, the State Government, the State Government, the Inspector General of Prisons, the State Government, the Inspector General of Prisons, the Inspector General Prisons, State Governments, the State Government, Clause 1 of Rule 29, the Inspector General of Prisons, Council of Ministers, the State Government, the State Government, the Government of a State, the Rules of Business, the Supreme Court, Lordships, Council of Ministers, Cabinet, Council of Ministers, Council of Ministers, the Rules of Business, the State Government, the Rules of Business, the State Government, the Rules of Business, Annexure R1, the State Government, the Inspector General of Prisons, the Inspector General of Prisons, Inquiry under Rule 14, Counsel, Government, Learned Counsel, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, tht Election Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Inspector General of Prisons, the Inspector General of Prisons

PERSON: Jailor, Jailor, Jailor, Guard Jairam, Alirajpur, Nos, L.S. Naidu, Shri Naidu, Nos, Shri Naidu, Shri Naidu, Shri Naidu, Shri S.P. Singh, Shri Singh, Bat, Lord Reid, Tirath Singh v., Bachittar Singh, Jailor, Incharge Jailor

CARDINAL: twenty six, 1, Three, 1, 2, 1, 2, one, one, 1, 1, 1, 29(1)(ii, 1, 1, 1, 1974)IILLJ465SC, two, 166(3, 1, 1, 10, two, 29(1, 29(1, 2, 874, one, 29(1, 1955]2SCR457, 29(1, 1, 2, 26, one, one, two, 100

TIME: between 12 noon

ORDINAL: first, second, third, 26th, first, second, second, second, first, first, first

LOC: Superintendent

PRODUCT: Role 29, Rule 14, Rule 14, Rule 14, Rule 14

FAC: Constitutional

EVENT: the Gentrai Clauses Act

LANGUAGE: English