Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mahila Ramjanki Vs. Pavan Sharma

Decided On : Feb-26-2003

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 13(1, Article 142 of the Constitution of India, Hindu Marriage Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2001(3, 403, marriage.3, 1, 3, 4, 581, one, 4, 269, 1, 119, 4, one, 2, 1, 1, 140

WORK_OF_ART: Their Lordships of Hon

ORG: Supreme Court, Chetan Das, Learned Trial Court, Trial Court, Trial Court, Learned Counsel, Ramjanki (N.W. 1, N.W. 2, husband.8, Trial Court, Court, Learned Counsel, Trial Court, Reliance, Apex Court, Chetan Das, Pushpavathi v. Manickasamy, Chetan Das, the High Court, Learned Counsel, Reliance, Apex Court, Court, Usha, Laxminarayan, Bhagat, Apex Court, Supreme Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, AIR 1999, the Apex Court, Court, Trial Court

PERSON: Kamla Devi, Addl, Counsel, Pavan Sharma, Bhabhi, Ratiram Sharma, Bhabhi, Kumar Sharma, Saroj Rani, Kumar Chaddha, Bhawana Advani, Mahesh Advani, Chanderkala Trivedi v., S.P. Trivedi, Chander v. Smt, V. Bhagat, Vijayalakshmi Balasubramanian, Bhabhi

NORP: Hindu, Balasubramanian

DATE: 24th June, 1988, a year, 25th January, 2001, the last 10 years, Para 5, the last 10 years, two years, about 10 years, 2001, made.11, about 10 years, 1984, 1992, about last 10 years.12, 1993, two years, 1993, about 9 years, 1994, 1995, 1968, 3070

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second

GPE: Distt, Counsel, Pushpavati

PRODUCT: Smt

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //