Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bhanu Prakash Agrawal Vs. Roop Chand and anr.

Decided On : Oct-12-1989

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 151, Section 12, Section 100A, Section 12(1, Section 151, Section 18, Section 18, Section 151, Section 100A, Section 100A, Order 41, Rule 21, Order 42, Order 41, Rule 21, Order 42, Section 152, Article 133(1)(c, Section 152, Section 82, Section 52, Section 44, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 52, Section 100A, Section 100A, Section 152, Section 152, Section 151, Section 100, Section 115, Section 12(a, Section 23 A of the, Section 115, Nagpur 84, Section 115 C.P.C.39, Act 29, 1984, Section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 100A, Section 100A

PERSON: K.K. Verma, C. P. C., T. N. Singh, Bhanu Prakash, Bhanu Prakash, Bhanu Prakash, Appellant Bhanu Prakash, Morar, P-8, Lakin, kar sakega jab, ki sthiti, Bhanu Prakash, T. N. Singh, Paragraphs 2, Bhanu Prakash, I. A. No, C. S. No, Shri R. D. Jain, Nagpur, jurisdictionby, C. P. C., Ratanlal, Gajadhar, 'Ganpatrai v. Chamber of Commerce, J., Civil P.C., Ganpat Rai's, Patiala, 805/ 7/3.27, Judicature Farman R. Shahi, Lal, Ganpat Rai's, Judicature Farman R. Shahi, Ganpat Rai's, Ganpat Rai's, Jhimi Bai, Jab LJ235, Gulab C. Gupta, J., Gulab C. Gupta, Gulab C. Gupta, Shri Vishnu Autar v. ShivAutar, Deepchand, Govind Ram v. Smt, Gopal Digambar Jain Sidhnath Mahavidya-laya, T. N. Singh, Umaji Keshao Meshram, Radhika-bai

NORP: J.1, Hon'ble, Farman, Farman, U.P., jurisdiction.42, Letters

CARDINAL: 12, 1, 6/87, 7/86, 29-6-1987, 1, 1, 30, 1, 1, 1, 12, 24, 3, 2, 13'6, 322, three, three, 23'6, 236, 3, three, three, 16, 21, 1/87, 1/87, 27, 15-4-1987, 20-4-1987, 6, 40/87, 12/87, 28-4-1987, three, 27, 26-6-1987, 26-6-1987, 27-6-1987, 29-6-1987, two, one, one, one, one, 1, 12, 151, 6, 2, 3, 7, 8, 24, three, at least one, 6, 8, one, 1, 182, 167, 167, 8, 152/1951, 4-6-J946, 4,762, 13/3, 24,005/ - 7/3, 6-12, 2, 15-3-1950, one, 16-3-1950, 152/1951, 8, 2, 6/87, 5 to 8, 31, 32, 2, two, 5 to 8, 5, 12, less than, 191, two, 942, 524, 1/80, 6/87, 393, 29, 6/87.45

GPE: Roop Chand, Roop Chand, Roop Chand, Roop Chand, Roop Chand, L.P.A., C.P.C., C.P.C., appeal.12, Trimbaklal, Godavari, C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., question.19, Ratanlal, C.P.C., Ratanlal, Ratanlal, Patiala, Patiala, C.P.C., C.A., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., Ratanlal, C.P.C., C.P.C., Ratanlal, C.P.C., Dattatraya, Kanhai, Ramchandra, Ramchandra v. Dattatraya, Jhimibai, C.P.C.

DATE: 24-9-1986, two weeks', 1961, two weeks', 1961, Section 12(1)(h, three months' time, 7-8-1986, 1961, 24-9-86, a month, one year, four months, 50/- per day, four months, 8'9, week, four months', week, 1961, 1987, today, more than ten months', four months', a period of, two weeks, today, '11, two weeks', 1:13, '14, '22, '23, '24, 1951, 21, August, 1948, 1999, '31, 1999, 1988, 1961, 1986, 1986, '11, 1986, 1986, 1575, 1986, 1986, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1988, 1988, 1986, 1986, 1272, 8, '8, 1908, 1976

ORDINAL: Second, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second

ORG: the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, L.P.A., Clause 10, the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, Court, the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, Court, Court, the M. P. Accommodation Control Act, Court, the Sadar Bazar Road, S.L.P., the Supreme Court, the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, Court, M.C.C. No, L.P.A., Court, Court, Letters Patent Appeal, Madhukar, AIR 1940 Nagpur 39, High Court, Section 108 Government, IndiaAct, Court, HighCourt, S. 107,Government, HighCourt, Division Court, Court, Letters Patent, a High Court, the Letters Patent Appeal, Clause 10, Letters Patent, Court, AIR 1949 Nagpur 188, Letters Patent, the High Court, Letters Patent, AIR 1949 Nagpur 188, Letters Patent, AIR 1952, SC, AIR 1949 Nagpur 188, Letters Patent, Letters Patent, a Lower Appellate Tribunal, Letters Patent, a Lower Appellate Court, a Lower Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Court, Letters Patent, AIR 1949 Nagpur 188, a Second Appellate Court, the Lower Appellate Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, AIR 1952, SC, Court, Civil Appeals Nos, the Pepsu High Court, the Supreme Court.25, the Marwari Chamber of Commerce Ltd., the High Court, the High Court, the Judicial Committee, The Judicial Committee, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, C.A. No, Supreme, the High Court, the High Court, the Patiala States, Bikarmi, The Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1949 Nagpur 188, AIR 1952, SC, AIR 1952, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Patiala States, Bikarmi, Clause 10 Letters Patent, the Supreme Court, AIR 1952 SC409, AIR 1949 Nagpur 188.36, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, AIR 1949 Nagpur 188.37, Letters Patent Appeal, Govind, the High Court, the Madhya Pradesh Amending Act 29 of 1984, District Court, the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, Sinchai Rajila, AIR 1980 SC, the Supreme Court, the State of Madhya Pradesh, district Courts, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Division Benches, Gaya Prasad, Pirbux v. Babulal, AIR, AIR 1989, the M.P. High Court, Rajmata Vijaye Raje Scindia's, Letters Patent, Cur Civ LJ (SC, the High Court, the High Court, Letters Patent, Clause 10, Letters Patent

EVENT: Clause 10, Clause 15

LOC: the District Judge

PRODUCT: S, Jab LJ 344, Jab LJ 344, Jab LJ 235, Jab LJ 86

FAC: the Pepsu Ordinance, Pepsu Ordinance, Ganpat Rai's, Ganga Vishan Hiralal

WORK_OF_ART: Madh Pra 285

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //