Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gajadhar Prasad Nathu Lal Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Decided On : Aug-10-1966

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 27, Section 27 of the Act, Section 27, Section 27, Section 66, Section 66, Section 66(5

ORG: Dixit, Appellate Tribunal, Gajadhar Prasad, the High Court, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, says:'The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, M. M. Ispahani Ltd., Excess Profits Tax, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, M.M. Ispahan Ltd., Excess Profits Tax, Karnani Industrial Bank Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal

DATE: 1957, 1922, 1955, 1922, 1962, 46, 703, 1957, 1956, 16

PERSON: Nathu Lal, Satna, Shri Tankha, Shri Khirwadkar, Arisetty Butchanna, Joseph, Madhya Pradesh

CARDINAL: 2, 3. Section 27, one, 6, 6, one, 27, 188, 191, 267, 30, 150

NORP: Indian

GPE: Sons, A.I.R.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //