Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Gajadhar Prasad Nathu Lal Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Decided On : Aug-10-1966
Court : Madhya Pradesh
LAW: Section 27, Section 27 of the Act, Section 27, Section 27, Section 66, Section 66, Section 66(5
ORG: Dixit, Appellate Tribunal, Gajadhar Prasad, the High Court, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, says:'The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, M. M. Ispahani Ltd., Excess Profits Tax, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, M.M. Ispahan Ltd., Excess Profits Tax, Karnani Industrial Bank Ltd., the Calcutta High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal
DATE: 1957, 1922, 1955, 1922, 1962, 46, 703, 1957, 1956, 16
PERSON: Nathu Lal, Satna, Shri Tankha, Shri Khirwadkar, Arisetty Butchanna, Joseph, Madhya Pradesh
CARDINAL: 2, 3. Section 27, one, 6, 6, one, 27, 188, 191, 267, 30, 150
NORP: Indian
GPE: Sons, A.I.R.