Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vinayak Dattatraya Vs. Hasanali Haji Nazarali

Decided On : Jul-23-1960

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Section 36, the Stamp Act, Article 33, the Stamp Act, Section 27, the Stamp Act, Section 64, Article 33, Order 13, Rule 4, Section 36, the Stamp Act, Article 33, Order 13 Rule 4, Section 36, the Stamp Act, Order 13 Rule 4, Section 61 of the Act, Section 61(1, Section 36, Article 33, Section 27, Section 27, Section 64, the Stamp Act, Section 27, the Stamp Act, Section 49, the Registration Act, Section 64, the Stamp Act, Section 27, Section 35, Article 33.10

GPE: Krishnan, hai, hai

CARDINAL: 1, 64, one, 212, two, one, only one

ORG: Sections 27, AIR 1922 All, ordered:'In, me.4, Allahabad, Court, Court, Allahabad, Court, Court, Court, Judicial, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, Civil Court, ILR, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, AIR, Legislature, Allahabad, the Allahabad High Court, Legislature, State

DATE: 61, 1952, 1010, 1954 Raj 173

PERSON: Muhammad Muzaffar Ali, Saksha, Shivaji v. Gopalji, suo motu, Moon Lal v. Sampat Lal, Rajasthan, Ratanlal v. Daudas

ORDINAL: first, second, second, first, first, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //