Babulalji Saksena (Vijay Sankar) and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Bharat

Decided On : Apr-16-1954

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 16, Clause, Constitution, Article 234 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution or under Rule 3 of, Article 16(1, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 311, Article 311 of the Constitution, Section 6, Article 311 of the Constitution as, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 310, Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 310, Article 311, Article 311, Article 234 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution.24, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, Rule 49, Constitution, Article 311, Rule 49, Rule 6, Rule 49, Article 226.26, Article 311.It, Article 311, Article 311.In, Constitution, Article 14, Article 16, Article 14 nor Article 16

ORG: Nevaskar, the Government of Madhya Bharat, State, Rajgarh State of, State, Registrar, State, State, Rajgarh State, State, State, the Retrenchment Rules, State, State, State, State, State, State, Madhya Bharat Punishment and Appeals, Court, State, the Madhya Bharat Judicial Service, XVI, the Madhya Bharat Government, State, State, the Madhya Bharat Judicial Service, Punishment and Appeals) Rules, Government, State, Government, Counsel, State, Counsel, State, Raj Pramukh, Raj Pramukh's, Crown, State, Counsel, State, Court, Learned Advocate-General, Madhya Bharat, Madhya Bharat, State, State, screening.21A. Initial, Mohan Rao Committee, the Public Service Commission, Rules of Judicial Service, the Raj Pramukh, the Public Service Commission, State, Judicial, Advocate-General, Supreme Court, Satischandra Anand v. Union of India, Supreme Court, Court, Dixit, Uttar Pradesh A.I.R., Invoke, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal, Civil Services, Classification Control and Appeal), Civil Services (, State, State, the Judicial Service of Madhya Bharat, J., State, State

NORP: J.1, Indian, Bharat, Bharat

PERSON: Nos, Vijay Shankar, Vijay Shankar, Madhya Bharat, Madhya Bharat, Chanderi, Gazette, Madhya Bharat, Madhya Bharat, Madhya Bharat, Madhya Bharat, the Raj Pramukh, Rege, Madhya Bharat, Rajgarh State, Madhya Bharat, Prem Biharilal, Saxena, Kewal Mal Singhi v., Heta Ram, Madhya Bharat, Rege, Rege, given.27, Rajasthan, Vijay Shankar

DATE: 22, 30, 32, 37, 39, 1953, 16 December 1952, 30 June 1948, 31 March 1949, 2 April 1949, 31 May 1952, the fourth week, May 1952, 20 May 1952, 31 May 1952, 8 January 1953, 1 June 1952, 16 December 1952, 19 December 1952, aforesaid.6, 15 April 1948, 30 June 1948, 15 April 1948, 1950, 12 July 1949, 1949, 1951, Articles 311, 54, 1961, Rule 49, succeed.25, 49, 1953

CARDINAL: 40, 296, 5, 1, two, two, 8, 252, 1, two, 1, 8, 20, 22, two, two, 8, 1953]4SCR655, two, 793, 1953]4SCR655, 12, seven, only two, two, 12, 19;We, 311(2, 40, 16

LOC: Central India

GPE: Rajgarh State, Talen, Madhya, Bhilsa, States, Rajgarh State, United State, Clause, Counsel, Clause, England, Counsel, Counsel, States, States, Counsel, Madhya, A.I.R., Munshirhm, Madhya, A.I.R., Chaturvedi, States, A.I.R., Wanchoo, Madhya

ORDINAL: second, second, first, first, second, third, first, first

TIME: the afternoon

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India

EVENT: Fart II

FAC: Identical, Sri Shankarlal Ojha

PRODUCT: Articles 14