Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Gopal Prasad Kaushik Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.
Decided On : Nov-12-2008
Court : Chhattisgarh
LAW: Section 36, Section 66-A of, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.9
PERSON: ORDERSatish K. Agnihotri, Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Upaj Mandi Adhiniyam, N.P. Ponnuswami, Namakkal Constituency, Willes, Hurdutrai, Mohinder Singh Gill, Anr, Manda Jagannath v., K.S. Rathnam, N.P. Ponnuswami, Avtar Singh Hit, Delhi Sikh, N.P. Ponnuswami, Gurdeep Singh Dhillon v. Satpal, H.C. Kamthan, Karera
NORP: J.1, Nevile
ORG: the Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti, Village Parsada, the Chhattisgarh Panchayat Raj Adhiniyam, Shri B.L. Dembra, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Salem Distt, Water Works Co., Hawkesford, the House of Lords, London Express Newspaper Ltd., AC 368, the Privy Council, Tabago, Gordon Grant & Co., AC 532, State of Mask & Co., the Hon'ble Supreme Court, High Court, Ors, v. Election Commission of India and Ors, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Gurudwara Management Committee and Ors, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Tribunal, Court, Reliance, Halke Mahate, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Court
GPE: District Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Manakkal, NS, Trinidad, New Delhi, Barua
TIME: 20-1-2006
CARDINAL: 24, 5, 5, five, two, 4, 5, 5, 1972.Learned, 1952]1SCR218, six, 336, 356, three, One, 709, 343, 349, only one, 10, 39
FAC: the Mandi Samiti
DATE: 1993, 26th January, 2001, 1859, 1919, 1935, 1978]2SCR272, 2006, 1969
MONEY: 6 CB
ORDINAL: second, third, second