Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Santosh Vishwakarma and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh)

Decided On : Apr-27-2004

Court : Chhattisgarh

LAW: Section 397, Section 401, Section 306, Section 34, Section 306, Section 34, Section 306, Section 107, Section 306, Section 306, Section 107, Section 306

NORP: J.1

DATE: 16-5-1996, 5-12-1994, 6-12-1994, 17-12-1994, 4-12-1994, 17-12-1994, ten years, 2001, 2002, 1141, two days, 1990, 76, 1977, 39, 1979, 6-12-1994, 16-5-1996

ORG: the Additional Sessions, Additional Sessions, the Additional Public Prosecutor, IPC, the Police Station, Sarkanda, the Police Station, Civil Lines, merg, merg, Anand Kumar Dhruv, Anand Kumar Dhruv, the Police Station, Police Station, Civil Lines, IPC, Additional Sessions, Learned Counsel, FIR, Panel Lawyer, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, The Hon'ble Apex Court, Court, Court, Sanju, instigation-- Words, the Hon'ble Apex Court, State, M.P. v. S.B. Johari and Ors, Court, Court, Court, Niranjan Singh Karam Singh Punjabi, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Court, State of Bihar v. Ramesh Singh, Union of India, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, IPC, Court, Anand Kumar Dhruv, IPC

PERSON: Bilaspur, Kartikram Dhruv, Kumar Dhruv, Panchanama, Kartikram Dhruv, Kumar Dhruv, Manoj Dhruv, Kumar Dhruv, Santosh Vishwakarma, Manoj Singh, Kumar Dhruv, Kumar Dhruv, Kartikram Dhruv, Kumar Dhruv, Santosh Vishwakarma, Manoj Singh, Kumar, Singh Sengar v. State of M.P.,reported, Jitendra Bhimraj Bijjayya, Kumar Samal, Kumar Dhruv

CARDINAL: 454/1994, about 7.30, 5/94, one, one, 9, 618, note--, 2000(3, 164, 2000(1, 142, 4, 4, 3, 227, 4

TIME: about 6 p.m.

GPE: Khageshwar, Anand, Khageshwar, Anand, Anand, Khageshwar, Khageshwar, Khageshwar, Ramesh, Anand

ORDINAL: firstly, secondly, thirdly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //