Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State of Punjab Vs. Saurabh Bakshi

Decided On : Mar-30-2015

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Section 279/304A, Section 279/304A IPC, Section 304A IPC, Section 304A, Section 304A IPC, Section 304A IPC, Section 357-A., Section 357-A, Section 304A, Section 304A, Section 304-A IPC, Section 4, Section 304A IPC, Section 304A IPC, Section 357(3

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, S.L.P., the High Court, IPC, Ramesh Chand, PB-09-C-6292, Shavinder Kumar, FIR, Magistrate, Rs.2000/-, Criminal Revision No.2955, the High Court, the Criminal Revision, Jagdish Ram, MACT, Court, Jagdish Ram, the High Court, State, Additional Advocate General, the High Court, the High Court, State of Punjab, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Criminal Appeal, State, The High Court, the High Court, IPC, The High Court, State, Learned Counsel, State, the High Court, Court, Sentence, follows:-"0, the High Court, the High Court, State, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the District Legal Services,, Authority, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, the Judicial Magistrate, IPC, State, State, Sections 337, IPC, Rs.2000/-, State, State, State, Court, the Motor Vehicles Act, Court, Court, Court, State, follows:-"8, Court, the High Court, Cicero, Magistrate, IPC, Crl Appeal

DATE: 2014, centuries, today, one year, 2013, 5329, 5330, Rs.85,000/-, 24 days, one year, 2015, one year, three months, 10 days, 10 days, only 10 days, 10 days, six months, six months, three months, sentence.10, 15 days, six months, six months, 45 days, 1988, 24 days, one year, 2012, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2012, 2000, 2008, 1979, 1987, 1991, 19940 4, 2002, 2005, 2008, 2012, 2006, 2013

PERSON: Versus Saurabh Bakshi, J.Long, Sophocles, Law, Benjamin N. Cardizo, Shavinder Kumar @ Tinku, Tinku, Ramesh, Rajindra Hospital, Jagdish, Shavinder Kumar, Patiala, Addl, Judicial Magistrate, Patiala, Addl, Patiala, Jagdish Ram, Kumar @ Tinku, Saurabh Bakshi, Meenakshi Arora, V. Madhukar, Meenakshi Arora, Madhukar, Balwinder Singh, Guru Basavaraj Alias Benne Settappa v. State, Meenakshi, Gopal Singh v. State, Jagdish Ram, Arora, Mehtaab, Bench, Sushila Bai, RI, Balwinder Singh, Nagabhushanam, Bench, Dalbir Singh, Bench, Sevaka Perumal, Jashubha Bharatsinh Gohil v. State, Sharanappa Basanagouda, pic].which, Siriya, Friedman, Alister Anthony Pareira v. State, Gopal Singh, Bench, Friedman, Shyam Narain v. State, J.[PRAFULLA C. PANT

CARDINAL: one, one, two, 14.6.2007, one, 25/30, six, 23.4.2012, Rs.35,000/-, 30.9.2013, two, two, two, 337, 7, 2, 2, 5, 3, 5, 337, 279, two, 1, One, 13, one, two, 338, 279, 304A, two, one, 279, 336, 337, 338, 279, 304, 336, 337, 338, two, 7, 17, six, 2015.-.----------------------, 1, 2, 7 SCC545[4, 2, 28.11.2014, 6, 5, 5 SCC730[8, 4, 9, 1, 3, 3, 5, 8, 2, 2, 7, 24

WORK_OF_ART: Jagdish Ram, Swinder Kumar @ Tinku

LANGUAGE: Sangrur

GPE: Patiala, Des Raj, Tinku, Mehmadpur, Patiala, Ramesh Chand, Jagdish, Suresh, the State of Kerala, Dalbir, Singh v. State, India, Ratan, Singh v. State, Guru Basavaraj, Karnataka, Karnataka, Shailesh, Jasvantbhai v., Delhi, India

PRODUCT: Maruti, Maruti, Indica, Maruti, Respondent

TIME: about 2.00 p.m., working hours

NORP: Jagdish

LOC: Respondent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //