Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Northland Development and Hotel Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Oct-07-2005

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 256(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 263, Section 148, Section 148, Section 148, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 148, Section 41, Section 273A, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 148, Section 148, Section 271(1)(c, Section 40 of the Finance Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(iii

PERSON: Rajes Kumar, J.1, Finn, Lakh, Admin, Assessing Officer, Assessing Officer, lin, Assessing Officer, Sri S. D. Singh, Sri Shambhu Chopra, Anr, (c, Anr, Agra

ORG: the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Bank, Tribunal, Tribunal, Citi Bank, the Citi Bank, Bank, Citi Bank, Agra, Suit No, Bank, Citi Bank, CIT, Schedule 'K', Firm, Citi Bank, Bank, the Citi Bank, Assessing, the Citi Bank, Tribunal, ITA Nos, CIT, Tribunal, Bank, Department, the Citi Bank, Assessing, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Assessing, Tribunal, Tribunal, Bank, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, follows:-We, Citi Bank, Court, Citi Bank, Assessing, the Citi Bank, the Citi Bank, Bank, Court, Department, Department, Department, Assessing, CIT, Tribunal, Assessing, the Gauhati High Court, P.C. Aggarwal, CIT, Tribunal, the Gauhati High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, G.C. Aggarwal, CIT, Standing Counsel, Learned Counsel, Department, Apex Court, K.C. Builders, Asstt, Income Tax, Court, C.I.T., Shashi Agarwal and Ors, Learned Standing Counsel, Department, the Tribunal on the, Tribunal, Tribunal, theAppellate, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Apex Court, K. C. Builders, Asstt, Income Tax, Apex Court, Oxford English Dictionary, First Additional Civil Judge, Agra, the First Additional Civil Judge, Agra, the First Additional Civil Judge, the Assessing Authority, the Assessing Authority, the Assessing Authority, Appellate, Tribunal, the Citi Bank, Bank, Court, The Assessing Authority, Tribunal

DATE: 1961, years 1983-84 to 1987-88, the assessment year 1983-84, year, years 1983-84 to 1987-88, 1974, the year 1978, 30.4.1982, 1978, 15th November, 1984, 31st July, 1982, August 1982, 15th November, 1984, November, 1984, November, 1987, the assessment year 1983-84, the assessment years 1983-84, years 1983-84, 1984-85, 1985-86, the assessment years 1986-87, 1987-88, 13.5.1988, the assessment years 1984-85, 1985-86, years 1984-85, 1985-86, year 1988-89, year 1989-90, 31st October, 1989, para 5, this year, years 1983-84,1984-85, 1985-86, year 1983-84, 30th April, 1982, 31st August, 1982, the assessment year 1983-84, years 1984-85, 1985-86, 16th December, 1994, 7149, years 1983-84 to 1988-89, 2,50,000/-1987-88, November, 1987, years 1986-87, 1987-88, years 1983-84 to 1986-87, the assessment year 1986-87, years 1983-84 to 1987-88, 30' March, 1984, 30th April, 1982, the assessment year 1983-84, years, years 1983-84 to 1987-88, 30th April, 1982, years 1983-84, 1984-85, 1985-86, 30th March, 1984, year 1983-84, year 1986-87, year 1986-87, year 1987-88, that year, year 1989-90, 1989, year 1986-87, 13th May, 1988, year 1986-87, 30.4.1982, quarterly, years 1983-84 to 1987-88, 30th March, 1984, years 1983-84, 1985-86, these three years, the assessment year 1983-84, 30th April, 1982, the assessment year 1986-87, the assessment years 1983-84, 1985-86, the assessment year 1983-84, the assessment year 1983-84, the assessment year 1986-87, 30th April, 1982, April 30, 1982, April, 1982 to July, 1982, monthly, August, 1982, 30 days, year 1986-87, the assessment year 1984-85, year 1983-84, year 1983-84, that year, the assessment year 1985-86, year 1983-84, 3,38,194/-.For the assessment years 1986-87, 1987-88, 30lh April, 1982, 1986, 1987-88, 1964, '17, the years, years 1983-84, 1984-85, 1985-86, 30.4.1982, 1978, 30.4.1982, years 1983-84, 1984-85, 1985-86, 30th April, 1982, these three years, years 1983-84, 1984-85, 1985-86, years 1986-87, 1987-88, these two years, these years, years 1983-84, 1984-85, 1985-86, the assessment year 1983-84, the assessment years 1986-87, 1987-88

CARDINAL: 10,22,770/-, 293, 39,60,000/-, 39,60,000/-, 26,06,000/-, 39,60,000/-, 10,22,770/-, 16,58,101/-, 10,22,770/-, 17,34,664.23, 18,73,378/-1984-85, 5,87,914/-1985-86, 3,75,522/-1986-87, 8, 10,22,770/-, two, 52,07,873/-, 42,45,277/-, 52,07,873/-, 31, one, 10,22,770/-, 52,07,873/-, 10,22,770/-, 52,07,873/-, two, 10,22,770/-, 52,07,873/-, two, 98,054/-, 4, 1, 5, 1990]186ITR571(SC, 52,07,873/-as, 12, 2004]265ITR562(SC, 2005]272ITR36(All, 271(1, 1, 293, 52,07,873-15, 10,22,770/-, 52,07,873/-

ORDINAL: first, third

EVENT: Additional Civil Judge

GPE: assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, assessee, Counsel, income.19

PERCENT: 16%, 16%, 16%, 16%, 200%, 150%, 200%, 100%, 100%, 16%, 16%, 16%, 16%, 200%, 150%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 16%, 16%, 16%

PRODUCT: Para 1

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //