the Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-1) Vs. Subrata Roy

Decided On : Mar-17-2015

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 2, the Income Tax Act, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2(22)(e, section 2(22)(e, Section 2, Section 2, section 2(22)(e, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, section 2(22, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2(6A)(e, the Income Tax Act, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2(6A)(e, Section 2(6A)(e, section 2(6A)(e, section 2(6A)(e)."19, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2, section 2(22)(e, Section 2(22)(e, section 2(22)(e, section 2(22)(e, section 2(22)(e, Section 2, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2, section 2(22)(e, section 2(22)(e, the Companies Act, section 47, the Companies Act, section 2(22)(e, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2(22)(e, Section 2

CARDINAL: 03.2015, 1, 1,88,96,202/-, 1,88,96,202/-, 31, two, 290, 3, 56, one, 1.88, 4, 26.24, 25, 1.88, 5, two, 1.88, 01.04, 26.24, 10, about `26, 90 ITR13(Mad, two, one, 49, 164, 40,000/-, 2,95,87,800/-, 1,84,19,305/-, 26,24,12,223/-, 8, 26,24,12,223/-, 290, 9, one, 109, two, more than 10, three, one, more than 10, 5.99, two, 2.79, 3.20, five, 5.99, two, two, 347, 33, 3, 1.—The, 2.—The, three, less than, 16, 122, 17, two, one, two, one, two, 18 2(22)(e, 60, two, two, one, one, 20, 26.41, 26.24, 10, 290, 22, 340, 6,32,72,265/-, one, 20, two, 21, 23, three, 28,52,41,516/-, two, 22, 187C, 24, 60, 23, 26, one, 290, 10, 26, an order 11.04.2008, 45, 254(2, 25, 28, 26

PERSON: Rohit Madan, Ruchir Bhatia, Versus SUBRATA ROY, Percy, Arta Trana Panda, Appellant Through, Rohit Madan, Ruchir Bhatia, Versus SUBRATA ROY, Percy, Arta Trana Panda, JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE, R.K. GAUBA MR, JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, Rs.1,84,19,305, Shri O. P. Srivastava, G. R. Govindarajulu Naidu v., T. Sundaram, M. D. Jindal v., No.1162/2012 Page, Mukundray K. Shah, L. Alagusundaram, Karuppiah Chettiar, L. Alagusundaram Chettiar, Karuppiah Chettiar, Relief Bonds, applied.15, C. P. Sarathy Mudaliar, C. P. Sarathy Mudaliar, No.1162/2012 Page, No.1162/2012 Page, Misc, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, R.K. GAUBA

ORG: Satyen Sethi, Satyen Sethi, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, Sahara India Savings, Investment Corporation Ltd., SISICOL, SISICOL, AO, SISICOL, SISICOL, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, the assessee’s income.3, CIT, SISICOL, CIT, Judicial, Administrative, Judicial, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C), SISICOL, Judicial, the Chamber’s Dictionary, the Supreme Court, Bombay Steam Navigation Co., P. Ltd., CIT, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C), SISICOL, SISICOL, Schedule IX, SISICOL, Schedule VII, Judicial, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, CIT, SISICOL, Judicial, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, SISICOL, Judicial, Judicial, Judicial, SISICOL, CIT, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, Reliance, CIT, CIT, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, Judicial, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C), SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, the Supreme Court, Income Tax v., ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, Legislature, CIT, Tribunal, MKF, MKI, Tribunal, MKF, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, MKF, MKI, Bonds, MKF, MKI, the High Court, MKI, Tribunal, MKF, MKI, Income Tax v National Travel Services, ITAT, SISICOL ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, Government, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, Parliament, Income Tax, HUF, HUF, The Supreme Court, HUF, HUF, Court, the Supreme Court, Rameshwarlal Sanwarmal, Income Tax ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, The Supreme Court, Court, SISICOL, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, Court, SISICOL, AO, SISICOL, SISICOL, Bombay Steam Navigation Co., P. Ltd., Judicial, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C), SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, Section ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, SISICOL, SISICOL, SISICOL, Judicial, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, Judicial, SISICOL, Judicial, Court, Income Tax v Ankitech Pvt. Ltd., AO, JGPL, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, JGPL, AO, JGPL, JGPL, Court, Legislature, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C), Legislature, Income Tax v National Travel Services, Court, N, JE, JP, N, AO, Tribunal, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C), Act, Circular, SISICOL, SISICOL, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, SISICOL, SISICOL, WP, Judicial, the Circular of CBDT, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C), Circular, SISICOL, Bench, SISICOL, SISICOL, Judicial, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C) No.1162/2012, WP No.1162/2012, ITA No.398/2010 & WP(C)

DATE: 1162/2012, 22, 1961?.”2, 1992-93, August 17, 1987, 31-03-1992, Between 01-04-1991, 31-03-1992, 1961, AY year 1988-89, 17.8.1987, 1987, 06.07.1996, 1953, 1965, year, 1990, the previous two months, 1973, 1963, 1987, March 31, 1992, 31.3.1992, 22, 22, 2007, 1977, the financial year 1999-2000, the financial year 1999-2000, March 31, 2000, 2012, 22, 22, 22, the previous year ending next before the 1st day of April, 1933, the 1st day of April, 1946, the 31st day of March, 1948, the 1st day of April, 1956, the previous year, the previous year, 22, 31.05.1987, 14 17, 22, 22, 1972, 1922, 15 1980, 22, 1953, 22, April 25, 1991, February, March, 1992, the months of February, March, January, 1992, two months, 2012, 2012, 22, 22, March 31, 1975, 22.09.1987, substance.10, 22, 2015

NORP: ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT

PERCENT: 44 %, less than, 10%, 10 %, 35 %, 15% and, 50 %, 48.18 %, 44%

LOC: Sahara, Sahara, Act.12, Sahara India

PRODUCT: Accountant, ITR305to

ORDINAL: third, second, third, first, third, second, third, Third, second, third, Third, Third, third, third, Third, Third, Third, Third, Third

MONEY: 9 per cent, about 16 per cent, 9 per cent, 9 per cent

GPE: Ankitech, JGPL