Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Satya Dev Tiwari and anr. Vs. Smt. Uma Agarwal

Decided On : May-19-2005

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the U.P. Act No, Section 21(1)(a, the U.P. Act No, Section 22, the Explanation of Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, the Explanation of Section 21 of the Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Explanation of Section 21 of the Act, the Explanation to Section 21 of the Act, the Explanation to Section 21 of the Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.9

GPE: Kumar, E.W.S., Daheli, Sujanpur

PERSON: J.1, Kanpur, Barra Colony, Kanpur, Barra, Kanpur, Indian Soldier, Ranjeet Singh v. Ravi Prakash, AWC, Ranjeet Singh, Counsel, Ranjeet Singh

DATE: 24th May, 1999, 23rd August, 2003, 1972, 1972, about 27 years, 25 years, 23 years, 21 years, six months, 24th May, 1999, '21, 1925, '4, 23rd August, 2004, 1721, 2004

CARDINAL: two, one, four, four, 2, 1, 2, 2, two, two, 2, 2, more than one, one, two, 2, 2003.5, 2, 2, 890

ORDINAL: first

ORG: Kanpur Development Authority, E-275 Block E.W.S., the Kanpur Development Authority, Explanation, Explanation, the Indian Soldiers (Litigation, Clause(a, the Kanpur Development Authority, Court, Learned Counsel, Court, the Apex Court, SC, Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court

PRODUCT: Explanation under Section 21

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //