Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shree Nath Misra Vs. the State Bank of India and ors.

Decided On : Aug-11-2003

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Rule 49, the Constitution Bench, Article 226 of the Constitution

ORG: R.B. Misra, Bank, Branch, D.L.W. Branch, Branch, the Disciplinary Authority, Bank, I., carpet business area, Annexure-8, Mirza Murad Branch, Court, the Supreme Court, State of Andhra Pradesh, Inquiry Officer, Inquiry Officer, the Supreme Court, SC, Punjab National Bank, the Supreme Court, Disciplinary Authority, the Inquiry Office, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Disciplinary Authority, SBI, Ors, the Supreme Court, Disciplinary Authority, the Rajasthan High Court, ESC 949, the Appellate Authority, Girijesh General Store, Regional Office, the Regional Office, the Hon'ble Court, the State Bank of India, the Inquiring Authority, charge;(d, the Inquiring Authority, The Inquiring Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Inquiry Authority, The Disciplinary Authority, the Inquiry Authority, the Inquiring Authority, the Inquiring Authority, the Inquiring Authority, the Inquiry Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Appointing Authority, the Appointing Authority, sub-Rule, the Appointing Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, Inquiry, the Supreme Court:(I, National Bank and Ors, SC, SBI, Court, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Supreme Court, AIR 1971, AIR 1963, SC, Ors, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Superior Court, State, Ors, the Supreme Court, Court, Tribunal, The Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, Railway Board, Court, Paragraph No, Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Court, Annexure CA-2 and Annexure CA-3, Paragraph 14, the Supreme Court, Disciplinary Authority, Ors, SC, the Supreme Court, Bank, The Supreme Court, Bank, Officer/s, Employees, Chariman & MD, United Commercial Bank, the Supreme Court, Court, The Supreme Court, the Disciplinary Authority, the Appellate Authority, the Court/Tribunal, the Disciplinary Authority, Charge No., Charge No., the Disciplinary Authority, Inquiry, Court, the Disciplinary Authority, the Supreme Court, the Court/Tribunal, Court, Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd., Council of Civil Service Union, High Court, the Disciplinary Authority, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab and Ors, the Supreme Court, Court, the Disciplinary Authority, The Civil Court, the Appellate Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Supreme Court, United Commercial Bank, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Diyciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority

NORP: J.1

PERSON: Heard Sri K.N. Mishra, Counsel, Sri Yashwant Varma, Clerk, J.M. G.S.I., Mirza Murad Branch, Mirza Murad Branch, Varanasi.5, Shri C.B. Singh, Sri C.B. Singh, Sri R.P. Singh, AP Singh, Kamlesh Singh, C.B. Singh, N. Radha Krishnan, Shri Kunj, Kunj Bihari Mishra's, Yogi Nath's, Arvind Kumar Shukla, AWC, C.C. Limit, Kunj Bihari Mishra, Yogi Nath D. Bagde, Arvind K. Shukla, I. Zora Singh v. J.M, Orissa, Bidya Bhushan Mahapatra, Sharma v. M. D, Zora Singh, Bidyahhushan Mohaptra, Bidhyabhushan Mohapatra, Lal Sharma, Lal Sharma, Orissa, Vidhyabhushan Mohapatra, Niranjan Singh, Nikunj Bihari Patnaik, P. C. Kackker, Yogi Nath D. Bagde, G. Ganayutham, Wednesbury, CCSU, Wednesbury Corporation,(1948, Har Narain Singh, Bakshish Singh, P.C. Kackker

GPE: Counsel, 8.8.1990, C.C., District Varanasi, non-C.V.C., JT, JT, Bagwan, Singh v. State of, Rajasthan, C.C., F.I.R., F.I.R., inquiry;(IV, JT, Tandon, JT, JT, Counsel, JT

DATE: the year 1962, the year 1970, the year 1980, 24.5.1984, 30.5.1984.4, 4.10.1988 i.e., 3 years 10 months, 14:10.1988, between 1980 to May, 1984, five years, 30.1.1990, 11 months, 5 years, eight months, 1998, 1998, 1999, 2001, 1441, 2000, 8.1.1990, 10.7.1985, 40-85, 53 years, 1994, the age of 60 years in 2001, 1985, more than 18 years, Rule 49, '21, 1998, 1998, 1999, 2001, 1989, '25, 1969, 1996, 2003, 1947, 1985, 1984, 1997, 2003, six months

FAC: Mirza Murad Branch, Mirza Murad Branch, Mirza Murad Branch

CARDINAL: 8/10.1.1985, four, one, one, 10,000/-, 5.4.1984, 10, 6, 4, 3, one, 8.8.1990, 8.8.1990, 5, 548, 7, 739, 2, 2, 15.10.1993/30.11.1993, 5.4.1984, 8, 50, 2, 2, 4, 2, two, three, 5, 548, 7, 84;(II, 7, 739, 1441.23, 2, 24, II, 3, one, 1, 548, one, 14, 4, 457, 2, six, 4, 223, 374, 3, 6, 381, 2, 10

WORK_OF_ART: Criminal Case No

PRODUCT: Para 10, 779

ORDINAL: second, secondary

QUANTITY: 1998)9 SCC 220

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //