Harish Chandra Tiwari Vs. Baiju

Decided On : Jan-08-2002

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 38, the Advocates Act, Section 36B(2, Section 38 of the Act, Section 35, Prevention of Corruption Act

PERSON: K.T. Thomas, M. M. Kashyap, above.4, Chandra Tiwari, Baiju, Baiju, Prahlad Saran Gupta v., Anr, B. R. Mahalkari v.

ORG: the Bar Council of India, Court, the Bar Council of the State, the Bar Council of India, the Bar Council, U.P. Neither, the Bar Council of the State of U.P., U.P. Respondent Baiju, State, Court, Court, the Bar Council of the State, the Bar Council of the State, Court, the State Bar Council, the State Bar Council, the Bar Council of India, the Supreme Court, the Bar Council of India, the Bar Council of India, the Bar Council of the State, Learned Counsel, State, the Bar Council, State, the Bar Council of the State, the Bar Council of India, Court, Court, Learned Counsel, Court, Bar Council of India, Court, Court, Court, SC, Court, Court

GPE: India, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, India, JT, Counsel, JT, India

CARDINAL: three, 8,118/-, 3.8.1988, 3.8.1988, Three, 1, 2, 3, One, two, One, 3, 186, 3, 585, 4.4.1978, 2.5.1978, 9, 385, 11, 109, three, two

DATE: 1961, May, 1982, 2.9.1987, 12.7.1988, 8,118/-, today, less than one year, 1997, 1997, 1998, 1997

FAC: Lakhimpur Kheri

LOC: appellant.5

ORDINAL: first, Secondly