Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Molahey and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Decided On : Feb-08-2006

Court : Allahabad

LAW: the Master Plan 2021, the Land Acquisition Act, the Land Acquisition Act, the Land Acquisition Act, the Master Plan, Section 17, Section 5A, the Master Plan, Section 8, Section 11, Section 10(2, Section 12, the Master Plan, Section 12, the Master Plan, Section 10(2, Section 10(2, the Master Plan, Section 8, Section 11, Section 11(3, Section 10 of the Act, Section 17, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 6, Section 5A, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 13, Section 6, Section 5A, Section 4(1, the Master Plan, Article 48A of the Constitution of India, the Master Plan, Section 8, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, Section 11, the Master Plan, Section 4, Section 6, Section 17, the Master Plan, Section 11(3, Section 10(2, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, Section 4, Section 5A, the Requisitioning Act, Section 17(1, Section 6, Section 4, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 6, Section 4(1, Section 6, Section 5A of the Act, Section 4(1, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4(1, Section 3 of the Act, Article 48A of the Constitution of India, Article 48A of the Constitution of India, the Master Plan, Article 48A of the Constitution of India, the Master Plan, Article 48A of the Constitution of India, the Master Plan

ORG: N.K. Mehrotra, the State Government, the Lucknow Development Authority, The Lucknow Development Authority, Authority, a Public Notice, The Technical Committee, the State Government, the Lucknow Development Authority, Public, Committee, Public, The State Government, the State Government, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, the State Government, The State Government, Lucknow Development Authority, the State Government under Section 10(2, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, Committee, the State Government, Public, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, Committee, the Lucknow Development Authority, Committee, Committee, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Board of the Lucknow Development Authority, the Board, the Board the Master Plan, the State Government, Committee, the State Government, The State Government, Committee, the Lucknow Development Authority, the State Government, the State Government, the Committee for the preparation of the Master Plan, the Lucknow Development Authority, the State Government, the Master Plan, the State Government, Committee, the State Government, the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, the State Government, Ujariyaon Housing Colonies, the State Government, Nishatganj Residents Welfare Association, U.P., Court, the State Government, The State Government, Lucknow Development Authority, M/S, State, U.P., Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation, the State Government before Repeal Act, Nishatganj Residents Welfare Association, U.P., Court, the Lucknow Development Authority, Court, Court, Urban Planning and Development Act, the State Government, the State Government, Court, Nishatganj Residents Welfare Association, U.P., Public, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, Committee, Committee, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, Court, the State Government, Plot Nos, Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation, the State Government, The Technical Committee, the Technical Committee, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Development Authority, the Town Planner, the State Government, the State Government, Committee, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, Housing Colonies, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development, Supreme Court, M.C. Mehta v. Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, the Lucknow Development Authority, the State Government, Authority, Authority, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, Committee, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, State, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Ors, the State Government, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Ors, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, U.P., LAL, Notification under Section 4 of the Act, The Division Bench, Supreme Court, State, U.P., the Supreme Court, the State Government, Court, U.P., Government, U.P., Society, the Lucknow Development Authority

NORP: J.1

PERSON: Molahey, Sahkari Krishi Samiti Limited, Plan, Plan, Draft, Draft, Plan, Dainik Jagaran, Draft, Plan, Plan, Plan, Gomti Nagar, Plan, Plan, Plan, Plan, Gomti Nagar, Plan, Plan, Plan, Kanpur Road, Plan, Plan, Plan, Plan, Plan, Plan, Plan, Plan, Draft, Plan, Gomti Nagar, Plan, Plan, Plan, Plan, M. C. Mehta, Draft, Plan, Plan, Draft, Plan, Plan, Kishan Arneja, Kishan Arneja, Banwari Lal, Shakuntala Gupta, Banwari Lal, Pista Devi, Bhushan Goswami, AWC, Ujariyaon, Plan, Plan

DATE: 3768, 2005, 5th May, 2005, October, 2005, 2005, 2021, 3768, 2005, 2021, 2005, 9th April, 2005, 2021, 1973, 2021, 2021, 20.12.2003, 2021, 2021, 2021, the year 1983, 2021, 2021, 1991, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2001, 2021, 2021, 2021, 3768, 2005, Para 31, 2005, six months' time, 2021, 2021, 2435, 2001, 2021, 2001, 2005, 2214, 2218, 2241, 2245, 2247, 2266, 2272, 2295/1, 2310, 1976, the year 1999.8, 2021, 2435, 2001, 2021, 2021, 2001, 2001, 1973, 2021, 9th April, 2005, 2435, 2001, 2021, 2021, the year 1983, 2005, 2214, 2218, 2241, 2245, 2247, 2266, 2272, 2295/1, 2310, 1976, 2021, the year 1997, 2021, 5th April, 2003, the year 1997, 2021, 2021, 2001, 2021, 2001, 2021, 2001, 2021, more than six months, 1994, about one year, one year, one year, 1989, 1990, 2005, 2005, 2021, 2021, 2001, 2001, 2021, 2021

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 23.2.2005, 4.3.2005, 3768(M, 31.3.2005, 6, 9.4.2005, 278, 22, 19.3.2005, 24.3.2005, two, 23.2.2005 to 4.3.2005, 7.1.1997, 15,923.8, 20.100, 8,400, 1,868.5, 41,360, 6, two, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 9, 278, 22, two, 45.8, 8,400, 1,868.5, 1, 211, 1986]3SCR743, 2, two, 1, only 23,682, 1868.5, 41,360, 8,400

ORDINAL: 24th, second, second

GPE: Samuhik, Lucknow, Lucknow, Ujariyaon, Ujariyaon, Lucknow, Ujariyaon, Ujariyaon, Lucknow, Gopal v. State, Bhopendra, Singh v. State

PRODUCT: Bench

WORK_OF_ART: 31.3.2005, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, 31.3.2005, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan, the Master Plan

TIME: minutes, minutes

FAC: Sitapur Road, Hardoi Road

PERCENT: 20.30%, 7.9%, about 20.30%, only 7.9%, only 7.9%, about 20.30%

EVENT: SCD 237, Master Plan

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //