Rajesh Kumar and anr. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Decided On : Dec-11-1998

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 395, Regulation 230, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Section 395, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Article 19, Article 19(1, Article 21, Chapter XX, Constitution, Article 21, Article 21, Article 21 of the Constitution on the following reasoning, Article 21, Article 21, Constitution, the Fourteenth Amendment, Constitution, Article 21, Article 21 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 21, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution, Regulations 355, Article 21, Article 21, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21, Constitution

ORG: ORDER1, inter alia, Storekeeper in Venus Cement Factory Ltd., Venus Cement Factory Ltd., District Meerut, IPC, Criminal Appeal, Court, Narendra Kumar Agarwal, Respondents, Division Bench, Court, LJ, IPC, Cattle Thieves, Railway, Wagon, Railway, Cocaine, Telegraph, Sub-Inspector, U.P., AIR 1963 SC, the Supreme Court, Chap, State, State, State, People's Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India AIR 1997, AIR SCW, Court, U.P., AIR 1963 SC, LJ, Court, the U. P. Police Regulations, Court, AIR 1963, State, J., the U. S. Supreme Court, Court, Regulation 236, AIR 1963, Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1975, Cri LJ 1111, Court, the Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations, Court, AIR SCW, Court, AIR 1975, Cri LJ 1111, LJ, Division Benches, Court, the Superintendent of Police, A.G.A.

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 2, 5, 3, 2, 228, 2, 3, 229, 3, 18-10-95, 24-11-95, 3-4-96, 228, 229, 230, 231, two, 228, 231, two, thereof.(ii, 238, 2, 231, one, 237, 7.1, 1, 332, 712, 228, two, 2, 6, 7.2, 113, seven, 1, 332, 94, 142, 338, 25.The, 5, 338, 16, seven, 2, 148, three, 856, 6, 8, 299, two, one, two, 231, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3

PERSON: Meerut, District Meerut, S. A., S. Sc, Dehradun, Thakur, Meerut, Station Brahmpuri, Abdul Fahim-Corporators, Respondent Nos, Sri K.K. Srivastava, Regulation Nos, Regulations, Gonda, Guru Bux, Singh Bakshi v. State, Sri Sudhir Mehrotra, Addl, A. History, B. History, Superintendent, Bench, Kharak Singh's, Munn, J., Wolf, Common Law, Semayne, Semayne, Subba Rao, J., Frankfurter, Wolf, Kharak Singh's, Govind, Bench, R. Rajagopal, Tamil Nadu, Jeevan Reddy, Govind, Jugla Sharan v. Superintendent, Gonda, Gurubux Singh Bakshi v. State, Sri Sudhir Mehrotra, Nos

GPE: Brahmpuri, Dehradun, Brahmpuri, F.I.R., Jugla Sharan v. Superintendent, dacoit, Singh v. State, Chap, XX, Singh v. State, Field, US, Colorado, US, States, England, Colorado

DATE: 1983, about 32 years, about 28 years, the year 1983, 1983, more than 11 years, 1992, 1984, 1983, the family day in and day, three weeks, 1989, at least two consecutive years, two consecutive years, at least two consecutive years, 1964, 1963, 1997, 1964, 1963, 1963, 1302-03, 1876, 1948, day, 1604, 1306, 1948, 1963, 1975, 1378, 1975, 1994, 1994, 1963, 1963, 1378, 1975, 1989, two years, two consecutive years, surveillance.10, one week

WORK_OF_ART: Burglars, the Lucknow Bench

LOC: Burglary, Burglary

ORDINAL: first, 5th, 14th

PRODUCT: Regulation 236, 711, Regulation 236

TIME: night, night

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

EVENT: the Fourth Amendment

FAC: Regulation 236, Kharak

NORP: Indian, American, American