Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bhanu Pratap Pandey Son of Shri Rama Shanker Pandey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary Ministry of Defence,

Decided On : Jul-31-2006

Court : Allahabad

LAW: the C.R.P.F. Act

PERSON: Bharati Sapru, Counsel

CARDINAL: 1, three, 18.4,02, 12.11.02(Annexure-5, 2, 1945.3, 8.11.01, 18.30, 8.11.01, 27.12.01, two, 24.5.02, 12.10.02, 8, 12.10.02, 17.7.03, 9, 13.12.01, three, 12, three, one, three, three, three, three, three, 14.

ORG: Shri R.N. Pandey, Counsel for, the Union of India Shri D.K. Dwivedi, the Revisional Authority, the Force under Section 11(1, CRPF Act, Commandant, Commandant, the D.I.G. of C.R.P.F., C.R.P.F., the I.G.P. C.R.P.F., Central Sector, Learned Counsel, Allahabad, Learned Counsel, Force, Force, Force, Force, Force, Court

ORDINAL: first, second, third, second, firstly, Secondly

DATE: area.4, 1949, 08.11.2001, 36 days, ensued.11, 36 days

GPE: Dimapiir, Nagaland, Allahabad, Nagaland

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //