Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Bhanu Pratap Pandey Son of Shri Rama Shanker Pandey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary Ministry of Defence,
Decided On : Jul-31-2006
Court : Allahabad
LAW: the C.R.P.F. Act
PERSON: Bharati Sapru, Counsel
CARDINAL: 1, three, 18.4,02, 12.11.02(Annexure-5, 2, 1945.3, 8.11.01, 18.30, 8.11.01, 27.12.01, two, 24.5.02, 12.10.02, 8, 12.10.02, 17.7.03, 9, 13.12.01, three, 12, three, one, three, three, three, three, three, 14.
ORG: Shri R.N. Pandey, Counsel for, the Union of India Shri D.K. Dwivedi, the Revisional Authority, the Force under Section 11(1, CRPF Act, Commandant, Commandant, the D.I.G. of C.R.P.F., C.R.P.F., the I.G.P. C.R.P.F., Central Sector, Learned Counsel, Allahabad, Learned Counsel, Force, Force, Force, Force, Force, Court
ORDINAL: first, second, third, second, firstly, Secondly
DATE: area.4, 1949, 08.11.2001, 36 days, ensued.11, 36 days
GPE: Dimapiir, Nagaland, Allahabad, Nagaland