Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dukhan Prasad Singh Son of Sri Karu Prasad Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Department of Posts and Telegraphs, Ministry of Post and Telegraphs and ors.

Decided On : May-22-2006

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Rule 16, Rule 9, Rule 9, Rule 9, Rule 9, Rule 9, Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.7, Rule 69, Rule 9.11, Rule 69, Rule 9, Rule 9, Rule 9, Rule 9, Rule 69, A Constitution Bench, another Constitution Bench, Constitution, Article 12, Rule 9, Rule 9, Rule 69, Rule 8

PERSON: R.K. Agrawal, Dhukhan Prasad Singh, Certiorari, Bagapur, F.I.R., Sri P.N. Saxena, Sri K.C. Sinha, Sri Saxena, Sri K.C. Sinha, and(3, Deokinandan Prasad, Erry v. The State of Punjab ILR, Brahm Datt Sharma, Anr, Anr, Vasant Gangaramsa Chandan v. State, Subrata Sen

NORP: J.1, Mandamus, President.(b, or(3, Punjab, Rules, Nakara, Rules

CARDINAL: 10, 1.5.2003, 3, 2.(b, 2, 3, 5.9.2000, 2, 932, six, 30.11.1994, 9, 9, One thousand two hundred and seventy-five, 1, 2, one-third, 1, one thousand, 2, 2, 4, 2, 5, one-third, 6, 1983)ILLJ104SC, 22, 29, One, 20, 1985]3SCR1042, 1987]2SCR444, 1983)ILLJ104SC, 26, 1988)ILLJ453SC, about five and a half years, 1.5.2003, 3, 3, 10, 2, 2

ORG: Court, the Railway Mail Service, HSG-II SA, C' Division, C' Division, Original Application, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad, Tribunal, Tribunal, Accounts(Postal, the RMS Hazari Bagh, Original Application, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Writ Petition No.268, Court, Court, Tribunal, the Original Application, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Pension Rules, Government, Government, Government, Tribunal, Hazari Bagh Road RMS, the Pension Rules, the Union Public Service Commission, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, Magistrate, the Union Public Service Commission, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, otherwise;(2, Government, Government, the Pension Rules, Government, Government, the Apex Court, Haryana High Court, Government, D.S. Nakara and Ors, v. Union of India :, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, Poonamal v. Union of India, the Apex Court, State of Uttar Pradesh, the Apex Court, All India Reserve Bank, v. Union of India, the Apex Court, State, the Apex Court, State, v. Union of India and Ors, the Apex Court, Company, the Apex Court, Government, the Apex Court, Court, the Senior Superintendent RMS ', C' Division Gaya, Tribunal, Accounts(Postal

DATE: 6th July, 1959, 31st July, 2000, 1417, 2002, December, 2002, two months, 1st May, 2003, 1992, 1965, 13.8.1998, 1st May, 2003, 2003, 2003, 1st May, 2003, September 2003, 2004, 8th January, 2004, 2003, 23rd July, 2004, 1972, 932/92, more than four years, an earlier date, more than four years, 1967, days, 1992, December, 1996)10SCC148, 30 days, 23rd July, 2004, three months

ORDINAL: 5th, 5th, second, first, second, first

FAC: Hazari Bagh Road RMS, 5th September,, 5th September,

MONEY: 10 per cent, 12 per cent

GPE: India, circumstances:(1, K.R., O.P. Gupta v. Union of India

WORK_OF_ART: Criminal Case

PERCENT: 10%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //