Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramraj Rice Mills Vs. Commissioner, Trade Tax

Decided On : Aug-09-2000

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 11, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 9, Section 10 of the Act, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B, Section 14, Section 4-B(6, Section 6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 14(c, Section 4-B, Section 4-B(5, Section 4-B(6, Section 41, Section 4-B(6, Section 41, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6(1, Section 6, Section 6, Uttar Pradesh Act, Section 41, Section 6, Section 6(c, the General Clauses Act, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4-B(6, Section 6, Section 41, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 41, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(5, Section 4-B(5, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(5, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(5, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 6(c, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(5, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B of the Act, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(1)(a, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(2, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-A of the Act, Section 4-A of the Act, Section 4-B(6, Section 4-B(6, Section 11

PERSON: R.K. Agrawal, Meerut, Meerut, Meerut, Shri Kunwar Saxena, Singh, Ordinance, (c, G. Ekambarappa v. Excess Profits Tax Officer, Shah Sadiq, L. Hazari Mal Kuthiala v. Income-tax Officer, Ambala Camp, L. Hazari Mal Kuthiala

DATE: January 29, 2000, 93 of 1999, 1999, 1999, years 1986-87, 1987-88, 1992-93, 1948, the assessment year 1986-87, the assessment year 1987-88, the assessment year 1992-93, three years, January 13, 1999, January 29, the month of March, 1996, the same month of March, 1996, 1995, May 14, 1994, 1995, 32, 35, 38, 39, 1995, 1995, 1995, 1904, the assessment year 1986-87, 1987, July 29, 1987, 1995, 1995, '41, 1995, 16 of 1996, 1994, 1994, 1994, 1995, '38, 1995, 1897, '15, 1897, 1967]65ITR656(SC, 1995, 1995, 1988, 1988, 1238, 1988, 1988, 1238, 1995, May 14, 1994, August 29, 1987, August 31, 1977, March 19, 1979, August 31, 1977 and March 19, 1979, a particular assessment year, the period October 18, 1984 to March 31, 1986, October 18, 1989, years, April 1, 1986, March 31

ORG: the Trade Tax Tribunal, the U.P. Trade Tax Act, the U.P. Trade Tax Act, U.P., Trade Tax, the Trade Tax Tribunal, Standing Counsel, U.P. Sales Tax, Supreme Court, Kolhapur Cane Sugar Works Ltd., Union of India, Supreme Court, U.P. Act No, U.P. Act No, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, U.P. Act No, State, U.P. Act No, State, The Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax, U.P. Ordinance No, the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, U.P. Ordinance No, the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax (Amendment, U.P. Ordinance No, U.P. Act No, Supreme Court, Kolhapur Canesugar Works Ltd., Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Legislature, or(d, U.P. General Clauses Act, Supreme Court, U.P., Shah Sadiq & Sons, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Kolhapur Cane Sugar Works Ltd., Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Sons, U.P. Act No, Supreme Court, Sales Tax v. Anoop Wines, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Anoop Wines, UPTC, Supreme Court, Court, U.P. Act No, Supreme Court, Act, Act, U.P., Tribunal, U.P., Tribunal, Court

CARDINAL: 94, 96, three, 1948.2, 9,12,002.76, 5,52,931, three, 2000.3, 41, 5, 1979]120ITR1(SC, 6, 2, more than three, 17, 6, 6, 2, less than four, 6, 5, 5, 2, three, 1, 1, 21, 32, 35, 38, 39, 4, 6, 1987]166ITR102(SC, 15, 1989]2SCR152, 1987]166ITR102(SC, 71, 262, 71, 262, one, two, two, 1986.15, three

GPE: paddy, the State of, Mawana, India, India, Bansidhar, Rajasthan, jurisdiction.10, U.P., U.P., U.P.

NORP: U.P.

ORDINAL: first, second, Second, first, first, first

PRODUCT: Section 6(c

WORK_OF_ART: Amending Act, Amending Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //