Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sri Ajendra Singh, Vs. State of U.P. Through Its Secretary, Forest Department,

Decided On : Mar-07-2006

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Rule 5, the Forest Act, Forest Conservation Act, Article 19(1)(g, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.6, Rule 5, Article 19(1)(g, Rule 5, Rule 5, Forest Conservation Act, Rule 4, Rule 2, Rule 5, Rule 7, Section 2 of the Act, the Forest Conservation Act, Section 3 of the Environment (Protection) Act

PERSON: Saroj Bala, Aligarh, Nand Lal v. State, T.N. Godawarman, Nand Lal v. State, licence.8, Sahlolva, Tahsil Karchana, challan, Civil Misc, Vishwakarma v. State, Fateh Ullah Ganj, Thakur Dwara, Gorakhpur, Daya Nand, Prem Narain Singh, Civil Misc, Civil Misc, Civil Misc, Nand Lal v. State, Civil Misc, Civil Misc, Nand Lal v. State, Articles 14, Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, Rules 4, Civil Misc, Sri M.K. Kushwaha, Sri S.C. Mandhyan, Sri Mansoor Ahmad, Civil Misc, T.N. Godawarman, T.N. Godawarman, Counsel, Nand Lal v. State, Civil Misc, Suraj Prakash, Anr, Jaunpur, Jawahar Lal Sharma v., notice.35, Nand Lal, Suraj Prakash, Jawahar Lal Sharma, T.N. Godawarman, licence lee, Rules 2, T.N. Godawarman, Sri Anupam Malik, Lucknow, Thirumulkpad, T.N. Godawarman Thirumulkpad, T.N. Godawarman Thirumulkpad's, Civil Misc, T.N. Godawarman Thirumulkpad, Sri M.K. Jiwrajka, Government, Summon, Seek, T.N. Godawarman Thirumulkpad, Nand Lal v. State, Suraj Prakash, Anr, Jawahar Lal Sharma's, T.N. Godawarman Thirumulkpad, Nand Lal, Jawahar Lal Sharma v., Civil Misc, Van Sanrakshak, Varanasi Vritya, Civil Misc, Civil Misc, Vishwa Bhandar Saw Mills, Anr, wherein, T.N. Godavaraman Thirumulkpad v. Union of India, Jawahar Lal Sharma, Nand Lal, Jawahar Lal Sharma, Chandan Singh, Nand Lal, Nand Lal AIR 2002, T.N. Godawarman Thirumulkpad, Chandan Singh, licence.46

NORP: J.1, simultaneously.1, Rules, Maharashtra

CARDINAL: 36598, 1, 3, 1.2.1997, 3, 3, 3, 141, 4, 10 to 12, 4.3.1999, 10, 12.10.2004, 2, 2, up to 3, 3, 3.12, 2, 15,000/-, 8.3.2003, 20,000/-, more than 10, 2, 15.2.2002, 2, 23,8.2003, 25.7.2003, 40, 6078, 4, 4, 3.6.2004, 4.3.3995, 8.1.1999, 4, 4, 4, 3.8.1999, 4.3.1997, 23.8.200, 4, 10.5.2004, 19.10.2002, 19.10.2002, 28.5.2004, 4, 28,5.2004, 3.6.2004, 1, 781, 4, 3, 3, 26.2.2004, 12.4.2004, 2, 29.4.2004, 200524, 21.8.2004, 202, 4.3.1997, 31.8.2004, 10, 2.12.2002, 5, 31.1.2005, 21, 10, 47, 235, 6, 7, 202, 4219/40-2, 7, 141, 2022, 19, 9.4.1999, 5, 7, 4.3.1997, 5, 7, 3, 7, 2002)9SCC502, 3, 4.3.1997, 4.3.1997, 4, three, 15, 19, 8, 4.3.1997, less than 3, 15, 19, 8, less than 3, up to 3, 5), 6, 1997]2SCR642, two, 202, 10, one, two, two, 4.3.1997, 24.1.2000, 991/2000, 19.2.2000, 31.3.2000, 1997]2SCR642, 141, 9.5.2002

DATE: the year 1989, 1989 to 1997, earlier than the year 1989, the year 1996, the year 1996, 1978, 60 days, 60 days, 24.11.2003, 1.4.1997, 22.11.2004, 1978, 1998, 1978, 1980, the year 1981, 1978, the year 1997, 1978, 1978, 200410, the year 1989, 1989 to 1997, 20.11.1997, the year 1997, the year 1996, 1978, the year 1992, the year 1998, 1998, the year 1981, the year 1988, the year 1988, the period 1988 to, 2003, 29.2.2004, the years 2003 to 2005, 38580, a period of, three months, 1998, 23.7.2003, 23.8.2003, 200518, 18.1.2005, 9354, 1999, 60 days, 20.4.1999, 1957 of 1999, 26.6.1998, 2004, 1998, 27089, 2004, 2002, 18.1.2005, 200521, 22.9.1994, the years 1994 to 1997, 26.9.1992, 24.10.1992, 26.6.1998, the year 1989, February 1 1, 2004, 12.2.2004, 29.4.2004, a period of, two months, 12.11.2001, the year 1997.25, the years 1986 to 1996, the year 1997, 1995, 12.11.2001, 1978, 1978, 60 days, 60 days, 60 days, 13.9.2002, all the previous years, the current year, the year 1984, the period 1989 to 1997, 1964, 5, 1978, 26.6.1998, 1998, the year 1997, 1995, 1978, 1978, 26.6.1998, 1998, 60 days, Rule 5 of 1978 Rules, 1999, 1980, 1978, the years, the year 1997, the year 1996, 1978, 1978, Rule 5 of 1978 Rules, more than 60 days, 5, 6, 26.6.1998, 1998, 60 days, 60 days, 60 days, three years, 5, 1998, April 29, 2002, 26.6.1998, 1978, 26.6.1998, today, 60 days, 1978, 60 days, 12.12.1996, 1980, two months, one month, one month, 4th March 1997, 12.12.1996, May 8, 1997, 1995, 1997)7SCC440, May 9, 2002, 1986, June 3, 2002, 4th March, 1997, October, 2002, October 29/30, 2002, 15002/2000, all the previous years, the current years, all the previous years, May 9, 2002, October 2002, previous years, the year 1996, March 4, 1997, May 9, 2002, October 2002, October 2002

ORG: the District Magistrate, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, Court, U.P., AIR 2002 Allahabad, the Apex Court, Thirumulkpad v. Union of India, AIR1997SC1228, the Apex Court, State, U.P., the Apex Court, Godavarman, the Supreme Court, Court, the Apex Court, U.P., U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, Allahabad, U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, U.P., the Apex Court, Godawaraman, the Apex Court, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, the Divisional Forest Officer, Forest, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mill Rules, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations, treasury, Court, U.P., Ors, Court, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations, Saw Mills Rules, Court, the Apex Court, M/s, Janta Plywood Industries, Small Scale Industry, District Industry Center, the State Government, the Apex Court, State, Godawarman, the Apex Court, The Conservator of Forest, U.P., Ors, Court, the Apex Court, Circular, Court, Court, Court, U.P., Court, HP, Forest, the Apex Court, Court, U.P., Usha Saw Mill, Shivpur Bazar, Vindhyachal, the Directorate of Industries, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, T.N. Godawarman v. Union of India and Ors, the State Government, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, Court, 31.1.2005, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mill Rules, HP, the U.P. Zila, the U.P. Establishment and Regulation of Saw Mill Rules, Court, the Apex Court, Standing Counsel, the Apex Court, Thirumulkpad v. Union of India, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mill Rules, the U.P. Establishment and Regulation, the Apex Court, Thirumulkpad v. Union of India, the Divisional Forest, U.P., AIR 2002 Allahabad, Divisional Forest Officer, Court, the Apex Court, T.N., Thirumukpad v. Union of India, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Divisional Forest Office, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court of India, Standing Counsel, Counsel, the Apex Court, Thirumulkpad v. Union of India, Court, the Apex Court, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, the Apex Court, Uttar Pradesh, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, the Divisional Forest Officer, Divisional Forest, the District Magistrate, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills, HP, the Divisional Forest, the Divisional Forest, the U.P. Establishment and Regulations of Saw Mills Rules, the Supreme Court, Thirumulkpad v. Union of India, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Court, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Court, the State of Uttar Pradesh, U.P., M/s Punjab Sawmill, M/s Rana Sawmill, HP, HP, HP, Saharanpur, Court, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the U.P. Establishment and Regulation of Sawmills Rules, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Indian Forest Act, Court, The Apex Court, HP, the Apex Court, T.N., AIR1997SC1228, the Apex Court, the Central Government, State, the Central Government, the Central Government, Every State Government, Each State Government, State, Each State Government, State, State, The Expert Committee, Each State Government, the Supreme Court, the State of Maharashtra, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the State Government, State, the Apex Court, PCCF, the Supreme Court, Central Government, Central Empowered Committee, the Empowered Committee, Hon'ble Court's, The Empowered Committee, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Court, Committee, Hon'ble Court, this Hon'ble Court, Committee, Committee, Hon'ble Court, Committee, State, the Supreme Court, the Central Empowered Committee, Central Empowered Committee, the Supreme Court, the Divisional Forest Officer, District Magistrate, the Competent Authority, the Supreme Court, No State or Union, No State Government or Union Territory, the Central Empowered Committee, State, Central Empowered, the Supreme Court, Court, U.P., Ors, Divisional Forest Officer, Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Court, The Apex Court, Divisional Forest, U.P., the Supreme Court of India, Ors, Kanwal Deen Chauhan and Ors, Divisional Forest, Court, the High Court of Allahabad, The Supreme Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Central Empowered Committee, the Apex Court, the Central Empowered Committee, The Divisional Forest Officer, the Regional Forest Officers, the Supreme Court, the Central Empowered Committee

ORDINAL: second, first, first, 3rd

GPE: Deoria, Godawaraman, Jangigunj, Moradabad, licence,19, Singh v. State, district Mirzapur, Rules, Lucknow, Rules, Counsel, States

LOC: Eastern Circle, Varanasi

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India

MONEY: 209)/96 T.C. II

FAC: Schedule II, Schedule II

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //