Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Babita Jain Vs. Maya Garg
Decided On : Mar-03-2015
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 20, Section 25-B
PERCENT: 558/2012 %
PERSON: BABITA JAIN, Kumar Jain, Naveen Kumar Jain, Sharad Chandra, Sanjay Agarwal, MUKTA GUPTA, Petitioner, Jain Market, Shashtri Nagar, Sale Deed, Petitioner, Shop No.2, Subhash Mohalla, Nehru Gali, Gandhi Nagar, Petitioner, Shop Nos, Petitioner, Rs.8,000/-, Sunita Jain, Petitioner, K.K. Srain, Shashi Sharma, Shree Ram Sharma, Mohd, Sabir, Shree Ram Sharma, K.K. Sarin, Petitioner, MARCH03
DATE: Through:3. d March, 2015, 19th September, 2012, 1958, 10th February, 2005, the last five years, only one year ago, 10th June, 2005, 2011, 2013, 2011, only a year ago, the last so many years, a year ago
CARDINAL: 1, 1, 196, half, half, 1, 4, two, two, nine, one, 184, 361, 204, 1, 228, two, two, three, 8), two, two
PRODUCT: Respondent, Respondent, No.1
ORG: ARC, the Petitioner under Section 14, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Delhi-110052, Grey Fabrics, Veetrag Trading Company, Near Sanatan Dharam School, Shop No.4, Court, Shop No.2, Trial Court, Shop of, Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation, Shrishti Properties Pvt. Ltd., M/s, Pigott Chapman and Co., Ashok Kumar, RCR, Court, Trial Court, Court, Court, Controller, the High Court, Court, Central Government, Court, Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation, Court
ORDINAL: first
LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, North and South, raised.10
GPE: Delhi, Rs.5,500/-, Delhi, Delhi
MONEY: No.4