Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Babita Jain Vs. Maya Garg

Decided On : Mar-03-2015

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 20, Section 25-B

PERCENT: 558/2012 %

PERSON: BABITA JAIN, Kumar Jain, Naveen Kumar Jain, Sharad Chandra, Sanjay Agarwal, MUKTA GUPTA, Petitioner, Jain Market, Shashtri Nagar, Sale Deed, Petitioner, Shop No.2, Subhash Mohalla, Nehru Gali, Gandhi Nagar, Petitioner, Shop Nos, Petitioner, Rs.8,000/-, Sunita Jain, Petitioner, K.K. Srain, Shashi Sharma, Shree Ram Sharma, Mohd, Sabir, Shree Ram Sharma, K.K. Sarin, Petitioner, MARCH03

DATE: Through:3. d March, 2015, 19th September, 2012, 1958, 10th February, 2005, the last five years, only one year ago, 10th June, 2005, 2011, 2013, 2011, only a year ago, the last so many years, a year ago

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 196, half, half, 1, 4, two, two, nine, one, 184, 361, 204, 1, 228, two, two, three, 8), two, two

PRODUCT: Respondent, Respondent, No.1

ORG: ARC, the Petitioner under Section 14, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Delhi-110052, Grey Fabrics, Veetrag Trading Company, Near Sanatan Dharam School, Shop No.4, Court, Shop No.2, Trial Court, Shop of, Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation, Shrishti Properties Pvt. Ltd., M/s, Pigott Chapman and Co., Ashok Kumar, RCR, Court, Trial Court, Court, Court, Controller, the High Court, Court, Central Government, Court, Royal Nepal Airlines Corporation, Court

ORDINAL: first

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, North and South, raised.10

GPE: Delhi, Rs.5,500/-, Delhi, Delhi

MONEY: No.4

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //