Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rajendra Prasad Maurya Vs. Dy. Inspector General of Police (Establishment) and anr.

Decided On : Jul-25-2002

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 4 of U. P. P.A.C. Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, the Police Act, Section 9

PERSON: Sunil Ambwani, Heard Sri Jagannath Singh, Stenographer, K. Kuppusamy, Anr, Tamil Nadu, Arun Kumar, Roy, Commandant, O.P.D. Patient

NORP: J.1

ORG: the Office of Superintendent of Police, Allahabad, Sub -Inspector (M, Allahabad, Provincial Armed Constabulary, Allahabad, Regulation 525 U. P. Police Regulations, Police Regulations, the U. P. Police Act, the Government Orders, Union of India, Allahabad, Head Constable/Constables, Police Superintendent (Personnel, Allahabad, the Zonal Police Inspectors General/ Police Inspectors General, Ors, P.A.C. Battalions/Units, P.A.C. Battalion/Unit, D.I.G, The Provincial Armed Constabulary Act, United Provinces Armed Constabulary, the State Government, the Pradeshik Armed Constabulary, Uttar Pradesh Police, the Pradeshik Armed Constabulary, U. P. Police, Superintendent of Police, Allahabad, the Provincial Police Act, Allahabad, Regulation 525 of U. P, Police Regulations, Court, Nazareth ., Allahabad

ORDINAL: secondly, first, second, third

GPE: P.A.C., Allahabad, P.A.C., P.A.C., D.I.G. Zone, P.A.C., P.A.C., P.A.C., U. P., P.A.C., P.A.C.

DATE: 1948, 1861, 1998, 1981, 21-29 March 1990, 16.11.1989, 10 years, 4 years, 3 years, three years, 5 years, 1948, 1861, 1861, 1861, 1861, 1948, 7.3.2001

CARDINAL: 8, 1, 675, 52/45, one, one, 25.1.1989, three, one, 12, 6 to 8, 525, 21/29.3.1999, one, 1861.7, 525

EVENT: Police Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //