Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Musammat Haydari Begum Vs. Syed Jawad Ali Shah
Decided On : Sep-29-1933
Court : Allahabad
LAW: Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Rule 8, Section 491, Section 491, Rule 8, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491, Section 491
CARDINAL: 1, one, two, 97, 97, 139, 72, 44, 1239)5, 8, two, eleven
PERSON: Musammat Haidari Begum, S. Jawad Ali Shah, Section Mazhar Ali Shah, Syed Jawad Ali Shah, Section Mazhar Ali Shah, Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, Justice Bennet, Tej Bahadur Sapru, Eleko v. Officer, A.C. 459, Tej Bahadur Sapru, Rule 8, Justice Bennet
ORG: Court, the High Court, the Government of Nigeria, S.J. 452, the Supreme Court of Nigeria, the High Court of Justice, the High Court of Allahabad, Court, this High Court, the High Court at Allahabad, the High Courts, the High Courts, Court, High Courts, this High Court, High Courts, this High Court, Parliament, Letters Patent, this High Court, this High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Courts, this High Court
DATE: an early date, 1928, about 4f years, July, 1933, July 30, next day, August 2, 1933, the 20th of this month, the very same day, 1928, 1898, the year 1923, 1923, 1923
GPE: Gorakhpur, England, L.J.P.C., Halsbury, England, Province, England, England, Province, India, India, India
ORDINAL: second, second, second, first, second, first, first, second, second
WORK_OF_ART: L.T. 527, Laws of England 2nd Edition, Vol
PRODUCT: Rule 8