Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bal Kishan Vs. Ivth A.D.J. and ors.

Decided On : Sep-10-2003

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 21, Article 14 of the Constitution

PERSON: S.U. Khan, Landlady, Ambedkar Nagar, Rs, Landlady

CARDINAL: 1, 13, 3, 27.5.1993, 17, 2.5.1996, one, one, one, 2., 3., 4., 5., 13, 6, 1, 13, only two, 8, 9, 10, 13, 51, 16, 26 to 29, 30, 27, four, 28, 29, 30, 12, 13

DATE: 1972, 1988, 1993, 13.5.1985, 18 per month, 10 per month, 10 per month, 1972, October, 1972, 10 per month, 1972, six months, one month, today, six months, a month, one month, 1972, September, 1982, a few decades ago, the present day, at least 5 years, '26, 1987, an end on 31st March, 1998, 1992, 1972

WORK_OF_ART: P.A. Case No

ORG: IVth Additional C.J.M./ Prescribed Authority, P.A. Appeal No., Lohiya Nagar, Court, Lohiya Nagar, Bombay Rent Control Act, the Supreme Court, AIR 1998, SC, the Prescribed Authority, Legislature, U.P. Rent Control Act, The Supreme Court, AIR 1998, Rent Control, the Government of India, Investments, Supreme Court, the Rent Control Act, Legislature, the Rent Restriction Act, Court, the Rent Control Acts, the Rent Control Act, Government, Government, Social Legislation, Legislature, Legislature, the Bombay Rent Act, the Bombay Rent Act, Legislature, the State Ministers for Housing of 1992, the National Model Law, the Central Government, the State Legislature, U.P. Rent Control Act, Registrar General, Law Secretary Government of Uttar Pradesh

FAC: IVth Additional District

EVENT: U.P. Act No

NORP: Rules

MONEY: 50 per cent

GPE: Mumbai

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //