Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ravi Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Decided On : Feb-26-2007

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 26, Section 52D, Indian Forest Act, Section 52D of the Act, Section 52D of the Act, Section 68 of the Act.4, Section 26, Section 52D of the Act, Chapter IX, Section 52A(5, Section 52, Section 52A, Section 52B, Section 52A, Section 52, the Forest Act, Section 52D of the Act, Section 68 of the Act, Section 52D of the Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.9, Section 52D of the Act, Section 68 of the Act

PERSON: Poonam Srivastava, Pickup 207, Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur, Jurisdiction, Desai v. State, Anr, AWC, Gorakhpur, Gorakhpur

NORP: J.1

ORG: Tata Motors Ltd., the R.T.O. Gorakhpur, Oriental Insurance Company, P.S. Khorabad, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court, Learned Counsel, State, P.S. Khorabad, the State Government, the State Government, Tribunal, the State Government, the District Forest, the State Government, Jurisdiction, The Apex Court, Court, Jugal Kishore and Ors, U.P., XXII, Magistrate, A.G.A., Court, Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate

DATE: 7.2.2006, 2006, 16.9.2006, 26.11.2006, 1.12.2006, 1927, 1973, 16.9.2006, approximately six months, 1994, 1030, 1994, 1758, a period of, two weeks, 8233, three weeks, a period of, three weeks, a period of, one week

CARDINAL: one, 832, 379, 411, 3/28, 23.1.2007, 379, 411, 4, 1, two, 2002]SUPP3SCR39, 4

ORDINAL: first

GPE: Sunderbhai, Gujarat

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //