Praful M. Patel Vs. Wonderweld Electrodes (P.) Ltd.

Decided On : Sep-18-2001

Court : Company Law Board CLB

LAW: Section 397/398, the Companies Act, Section 283(1)(g, the General Body Meeting, Section 283(l)(g, Section 397, Section 397, article 7, Section 397, Section 397, Section 398, the General Body Meeting, Section 53, Section 283(1)(g, Section 397, Section 397, Section 397.In, Section 433(/, Section 433(e).In, Section 397, Section 397, Section 397.Therefore, Section 397

CARDINAL: 1, 23-6-1988, three, three, 30, three, one, 5, One, 4, 4, 4, 5, 7, One, 5,000, two, 20-6-1998, 20-6-1998, three, 1, 1, 350, 3, 85, 289, 87, 290, 32, 207, 53, 55, 702, 59, 41, 26, 1965, 35, 351, 47, 389, only two, six, 66, 188, 87, 615, 10, 5, 31-8-1998, three, 26, three, 397, 98, 575, 5,000, 100, two, 750, 3,000, 3, one, one, Only one, two, 750, 750, 750, 31-3-1999, 30-11-2001

DATE: 1956, 1-9-1998, 2-9-1998, 28-8-1998, 8-9-1998, 18-9-1998, 6-9-1998, 32, 4-9-1998, 5-9-1998, Sunday, 1999, 1992, 89, 1996, 1996, 1962, 1983, 73, 1984, 1971, 1977, 1972, 1996, 1989, 1996, only three days', 1999, 5-9-1998, 1988.For nearly 10 years, 6-9-1998, a month, 15 days, 15 days, 15 days

ORG: Wonderweld Electrodes (P.) Ltd., the Board of the company, AGM, Board Meeting, AGM, Act, Board Meetings, AGM, AGM, AGM, AGM, Coimbatore, the Board Meetings, AGM, Bench, AGM, LJ, CLB, Chemon (India, LJ, CLB, Binod Kumar Agarwal, Ringtong Tea Co., Esemen Metalo Chemicals, CLB, Needle Industries, Needle Industries Newey, Maharani Lalita Rajya Lakshmi, Indian Motor Co., AP, Coimbatore, Kalinga Tubes Ltd., SC, Orissa Ltd., Board, Respondents, Board, Westbourne Galleries Ltd., ER 492, Board, LJ, SCL, SC, AGM, Exhibit P-17, Exhibit P-7, AGM, Board, Board, Board, Anupar Chemicals, CLB, Board, AGM, the Board of Directors, the Board of the company, Board, Coimbatore, S/s Jitendar Patel

PERSON: Vidhya Shankar, Mahendra Manilal Patel, Mahendra Manilal Patel, Board Meeting, Rajendra R. Patel, Exhibit P-15, Mahendra Patel, Vidhya Shankar, Ganapathy Mudaliarv, S.G. Pandurangan, Rashmi Seth v., Sheikh, duties.4, Mihir J. Thakore, Chander Krishan Gupta, Girdhari Lal, Rai Saheb Vishwamitra v. Amamath, 854, C.P. Gnanasambandam v. Tamilnad Transports, N.R. Murty v. Industrial Development Corpn, Ebrahim, Pratapsinh Gaekwad v. Sangramsinh P. Gaekwad, Gadadhar Dixit, Vtkal Flour Mills, Shekhar Mehra, Surat, Surat, Surat, G. Mehta v., Rajcndra Patel

MONEY: 60 per cent, 30 per cent, 10 per cent, 60 per cent, 10 per cent, 60 per cent, 30 per cent, 30 per cent, 65 per cent, 60 per cent, 60 per cent, 30 per cent, 60 per cent, 30 per cent, 10 per cent, 60 per cent

FAC: the Board Meeting

TIME: 9-9-1998

NORP: Surat, Surat

GPE: ROC, Delhi, Smt, India, Ihc

PRODUCT: Section 397/398, 1 Comp

WORK_OF_ART: Nagavarapu Krishna Prasad v. Andhra Bank Ltd., 2 All

LOC: Shantiprasad Jain

QUANTITY: 3-11-1997,16-2-1998

ORDINAL: third

PERCENT: 60%