indodan Milk Products Vs. State of U.P.

Decided On : Apr-11-1980

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 4(1, a Full Bench, Section 4(1, the Sales Tax Act, Section 4, Section 4, Section 12, Section 3-AB, Section 3-D, Section 3-F, Section 4 or Section 21, Article 14 of the Constitution.(2, Article 19 of the Constitution.(3, Article 301 of the Constitution, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Article 14 or, Article 174, Article 14 of the Constitution.13, Article 19, Section 4, Article 19, Article 19 of the Constitution.14, Article 301 of the Constitution, Section 12, Section 8(2A, Section 8(2A, The Central Act, the Sales Tax Act, Section 4(1, Section 4, Section 11(6, Section 12, Section 4, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 12, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 3 of the Act, Section 5(2, Section 5 of Ordinance No

NORP: Satish, inter-State

ORG: the State Government, Court, Products (India) Ltd., the U.P. Sales Tax Act, Indodan Milk Products Ltd., Sales Tax, U.P., F.B., Court, Court, the Provincial Government, The State Government, Court, the State Government, the State Government, High Court, the State Government under Section 4, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, The State Government, inter alia, State, Court, F.B., American Jurisprudence, S.C. 148, Court, F.B., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the State Legislature, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, F.B., Court, the U. P. Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the U. P. Sales Tax Act, the U. P. Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, Parliament, the U. P. Sales Tax Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, the U.P. Sales Tax Act, Court, the Supreme Court, State, U.P. v. Modi Industries Ltd., S.C. 513, High Court, the High Court's, Supreme Court, Sales Tax, the High Court's, the High Court's, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, a High Court, Parliament, the Calcutta High Court, State, the High Court, the High Court, the State Legislature, the U.P. Tendu, Court, the U. P. Sales Tax, Court

ORDINAL: fourth, first, first, first, 9th

GPE: Nestle, Muzaffarnagar, U.P.T.C., Clause, U.P.T.C., Jagannath v. Union, S.C., U.P.T.C., A.I.R., S.C., U.P.T.C., A.I.R., S.C., Sanshodhan

DATE: 19631, 1948, 7th June, 1948, 1954, 1963, 1973, 1963, 1965-66, the assessment year 1967-68, 20th July, 1973, 1974, 21st May, 1974, 1974, 3rd July, 1974, 31st March, 1956, from 31st March, 1956, 1956, 31st March, 1956, 1963, 1973, 31st March, 1956, daily, 1962, 1973, 1034, 1963, 1973, 20th July, 1973, May, 1974, ten months, 1948, 18 years, 1974, 1973, 1034, 1973, years 1964-65, 1965-66, 1977, 1972, 1967-68, 9th November, 1973, 25th February, 1972, 1978, 1974, 17 of 1974, 1972, November, 1973, 1967-68

CARDINAL: 14, 606, 14, 606, 569, 14, 606, 17, 4., 12, 1, 1, 1, 14, 606, 569, one, one, one, 14, 606, 569, 569, 803, 5, 21, 1979.20

WORK_OF_ART: The Full Bench, the Second Schedule, Sub-section, Second Edition, Volume 71, Amending Act

PERSON: Indodan Milk Products Limited, Ordinance, Gazette, Hira Lal, Lal v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur A.I.R., Hira Lal's, Indodan Milk Products Ltd., Mohan Pathak v. Union, Beg, Vyapar Viniyaman