Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

HusaIn Baksh Vs. Mr. Briggen Shaw (W.J.)

Decided On : Apr-10-1933

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Order 46, Rule 1, Rule 1, Order 21, Section 120, Indian Army Act, Section 2, Section 120 of Act 8 of 1911, Order 46, Rule 1, the Army Act, the Army Act, the Army Amendment Act, Section 4, the Army Act, Section 136, Section 60, the Army Act, the Army Act, Act 10 of 1914, Section 60(1, the Army Act, Section 136, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 60(1, Section 60(1, Section 2(17, Section 60(1, Act 8 of 1911, the Army Act, Section 60(1)(h, Section 60(1, Section 60, Section 60(1, Section 60(1, Section 60(1

NORP: J.1, detail.5

ORG: the Small Cause Court, Court, Court, A.T. Cavalry, the Small Cause Court, the Indian Army, Court, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the Indian Army Act, the Indian Army Act, Court, not.6, the Civil Courts, Subordinate Courts, the Subordinate Courts, High Court, the Honourable Court, the Indian Articles of War, Court, Army, Court, Court, Court, the Indian Army Act 8 of, Court, Council, Council, inter alia, Army, Murray and Co. Ltd., AIR 1914 Oudh, Judicial, Oudh, Court, Kering Rupchdnd & Co., the Bombay High Court, Court

PERSON: Jhansi, Hussain Bux, Briggen Shaw, C.P. Mule, Jhansi, Civil P. C., Hay v. Ram Chandar, Hussain Bux, Hussafan Bux v. Briggen Shaw, Majesty, Civil P.C., Civil P.C., Civil P.C., Civil P.C., Civil P.C., Civil P.C., Prins, Ram Chandar, A.L. Browne v., Civil P.C., Civil P.C., Civil P.C., Civil P.C., Civil P.C.

DATE: 9th June 1932, 24th June 1932, 300 a month, August 1932, only two weeks, 1917, 1917, 1930, 10th February 1930, 5th December 1932, 1911, 1881, 44, 58, 1895, 1895, 300 a month, 1917, 1918 Bom 32, 1936

CARDINAL: 33-8, 14, 39, 39, one-half, 5/44-9, 39, 8, 8, 45, 2, 2, One, 1, half, 199, 39, 122, 12

GPE: Quetta, Baluchistan, pay.3, District Judges, India, Clause, Clause

ORDINAL: 5th

FAC: the Governor-General, the Governor-General

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //