Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Lal Chand Jain

Decided On : Aug-01-1989

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 271(4A, Section 274, Section 271(1)(c, Section 274, Section 274, Section 66, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Section 256(1, Section 271(1)(c, the Amendment Act, Section 271, Chapter, Section 61, the Amending Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(iii, the Amending Act, Section 274(2, Section 154(1, Section 48, the Amending Act, Section 274(2, Section 60, the Amending Act, Section 253(1, Section 274(2, Section 274, Section 274(2, Section 274(2, Section 274, Section 274, Section 274, Section 271(1)(c

PERSON: R K. Gulati, Lal Chand Jain, Indra Chand Jain, Agra, Raj Rani Devi, Ram Lal Vohra, Dass Ram Gopal v. IAC, Mohd, R. Abdul Azeez v.

NORP: J.1

DATE: year 1973, September 7, 1973, April 22, 1974, April 2, 1974, 1961, April 15, 1975, the assessment years 1973-74 to 1975-76, each year, the assessment year, May 21, 1975, September 6, 1975, March 13, 1978, April 1, 1976, 1975, 1961, the assessment year 1973-74, March 13,1978, April 1, 1976, April 1, 1976, November 29, 1971, 1970, April 1, 1971, 1970, April 1, 1971, 1975, April 1, 1976, April 1

CARDINAL: 74.2, One, 33,965, 80,000, 57,840, 61,388, 25,000, 30,000, 2, 2, 30,000, 6, 2, 1, twenty-five thousand, twenty-five thousand, 25,000, 25,000, 48 and 60, two, 253, 2, One, 1979]116ITR215(All, 1979]116ITR215(All, 1979]116ITR358(All, 1981]129ITR473(All, 2, 25,000, 1979]116ITR215(All, 1983]142ITR101(All, 1983]142ITR104(All, 2, 1981]128ITR547(KAR, 2, 1976.15, 25,000

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Sections 154, CIT, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, another Division Bench, CIT, CIT, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, Oais, Co., CIT, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, above.14, the Karnataka High Court

PRODUCT: B-Bench

GPE: New Delhi, Clause, I.T.

ORDINAL: second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //