Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hindustan Cables Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and

Decided On : Mar-24-2008

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

LAW: Rule 233B, Section 617, the Companies Act

CARDINAL: 1, 1,000/-, 17.6.97, 215, 298

ORG: Order-in-Appeal No, the Commissioner of Customs, SDR, RT-12s, Asst, the Original Authority, Asst, Government of India, the Department of Telecommunication, DOT, DOT, DOT, Bond, Bank Guarantee, the Government of India, Bond, Bank Guarantee, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Samarat International Ltd., Tribunal, the Original Authority, Tribunal, TVS Motor Co. Ltd., CCE, Tri-Chennai, SDR, CCE &amp, Tribunal, Hindustan Wires Ltd., CCE, Bond, Bank Guarantee, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Personal Ledger Account, PLA, the TVS Motor Co. Ltd., Bond, Bank Guarantee

DATE: 31.10.2003, 1944, October 1996, February 1998, 4.6.1999, October 1996 to December 1998, 1944, 1944.Further, six months limitation period, 1974, the years, 1944, 1956, 2007, the financial year

PERSON: Shri V.J. Sankaram, Chennai, Rajiv Mardia v., Samrat

PRODUCT: Rule 9B, Rule 210 of the Central Excise Rules, RT-12, Rule 9B, Rule 9B, RT-12

WORK_OF_ART: the Range Superintendent

GPE: Delhi

NORP: Samarat

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //