Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Hindustan Cables Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Customs and
Decided On : Mar-24-2008
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
LAW: Rule 233B, Section 617, the Companies Act
CARDINAL: 1, 1,000/-, 17.6.97, 215, 298
ORG: Order-in-Appeal No, the Commissioner of Customs, SDR, RT-12s, Asst, the Original Authority, Asst, Government of India, the Department of Telecommunication, DOT, DOT, DOT, Bond, Bank Guarantee, the Government of India, Bond, Bank Guarantee, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Samarat International Ltd., Tribunal, the Original Authority, Tribunal, TVS Motor Co. Ltd., CCE, Tri-Chennai, SDR, CCE &, Tribunal, Hindustan Wires Ltd., CCE, Bond, Bank Guarantee, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Personal Ledger Account, PLA, the TVS Motor Co. Ltd., Bond, Bank Guarantee
DATE: 31.10.2003, 1944, October 1996, February 1998, 4.6.1999, October 1996 to December 1998, 1944, 1944.Further, six months limitation period, 1974, the years, 1944, 1956, 2007, the financial year
PERSON: Shri V.J. Sankaram, Chennai, Rajiv Mardia v., Samrat
PRODUCT: Rule 9B, Rule 210 of the Central Excise Rules, RT-12, Rule 9B, Rule 9B, RT-12
WORK_OF_ART: the Range Superintendent
GPE: Delhi
NORP: Samarat