Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

National Federation of Blinds and Another Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Decided On : Jan-28-2000

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 43, Section 43 of the Act, Constitution, the Supreme Law of Land', Constitution, Constitution, the Constitution of the United States of America, Article 25 of the West German Constitution,, the Indian Constitution, Article 51 of the Constitution as a Directive Principles of State, the Directive Principles of State Policy, the Directive Principles of State, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 37, Constitution, Article 38 of the Constitution, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Constitution, a Bill of Rights, Article 32, List 1, List 1, Article 15(4, Constitution, Article 15(4, Article 15(4, Section 43 of the Act, Section 43 of the Act, Section 43 of the Act

GPE: Raza, Lucknow, Beijing, India, India, England, the United States of America, the United States, the United States, Kerala, India, Vishaka, Rajasthan, India, Beijing, Australia, Orissa, India, Bhutan, Bhutan, Bhutan, India, Bhutan, India, Bhutan, the Kingdom of Bhutan, Bhutan, Vishaka, India, India, Psycho, D. N. Chanchala v., India, Beijing, India

ORG: R.D. Mathur, Court, the Lucknow Development Authority, National Federation of Blinds, U. P. Branch, Sri Dr. Pramod, Federation, Lecturer in Government Raza Post Graduate College, Doctorate, Parliament, the Economic and Social Commission, Parliament, State, the English Courts, Constitutions, Constitutions, State, State, the United Nations Charter, State, Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Directive Principles of State, Fundamental Rights, State, Fundamental Rights, Directives, Directives, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Keshaunanda, Legislature, State, Hon'ble Supreme Court, State, State, The International Labour Organisation, the International LabourOrganisation, International LabourOrganisation, International Labour Conventionsand Recommendations Geneva, International Labour Office, Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment, Recommendation, The International Labour Organisation, the United Nations, The Incorporation of the human, the United Nations, the International Covenant on Civil and Political, International Covenant on Economic, The United Nations, General Assembly, Mentally Retarded Persons', General Assembly, the International Labour Organisation, The United Nations Educational, Cultural Organisation, UNESCO, The World Health Organisation, the United National International Children Emergency Fund, the United Nations Development Programme, the Food Agricultural Organisations, The United Nations Industrial Development Organisation, the Office of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees, Lucknow Development Authority, International, Hon'ble Supreme Court, State, the Legislature of that, State, State, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hon'ble Supreme Court, The High Court of Australia, Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Aus LR 353, Nilabati Behera, ICCPR, SC 431, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the State Government, State, Union, State, Hon'ble Supreme Court, Parliament, State, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, theConstitution of India, Parliament, The Persons with Disabilities (, Protection of Rightsand Full Participation) Act, Physical Rehabilitation, Vocational Rehabilitation, decency.27, Hon'ble Supreme Court, SC, Defence, Ex-Defence, Defence, the United Nations, World Health Organisation, State, theParliament, State, the UnitedNations Organisations and Section 43of, the State Government, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority, State, the Lucknow Development Authority, Scheme, Scheme, the State Government, the Development Authorities, Scheme, the Lucknow Development Authority, The State Government, the Lucknow Development Authority, The Lucknow Development Authority, the Lucknow Development Authority

CARDINAL: one, 2, 2, 43,200, 2, 1/10, 3, 4., 2, one, 4, two, 1982).19, 159, 168, two, 6, 241, 128, 2, 23, 3, 14, 41, 1, 42, 1995.which, three, two, 1995.29, 27.9.1999, 27.9.1999, 1, 3, 2

PERSON: Kumar Singh, Rampur, Pramod Kumar Singh, Shikshak Vihar, Jankipurarn Extension, Keshavananda v. State, Umesh Chandra, Stateof Rajasthan, Nos

FAC: Sitapur Road, 288

DATE: Sector 1 ', 1995, 1995, '43, 1993-2002, 1st to 5th December, 1992, the Forty Ninth year of the Republic of India, 1949, 1973, the recent years, 1919, 1921, 1919-1949, 1949, 1983, 1983, 13th July, 1953, 30th July, 1965, 20th December, 1971, December, 1975, 1997, 1993, 1999, '24, thecontrary, 1971, 1762, 1775, '28, years 1983-1992, The decade, the decade, 1993-2002)convened, September, 1992, 1995, 1995, wrong.30, a period of, three months

NORP: Asian, Asian, Asian, Indian

LOC: Pacific Region, Pacific Region, Pacific Region

WORK_OF_ART: The Preamble of the Act, 'Whereas the Meeting to Launch the Asian and Pacific Decade of Disabled Persons, 'Declaration, 'Declaration on the Rights of Disabled Persons', 14 List 1

EVENT: the Preamble of the Act, Geneva-International Labour Office, the Fourth World Conference on Women, the Constitution of India

ORDINAL: first, first, 9th

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //