Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Chhagan Lal Rathi Vs. Income-tax Officer, District Iii(i), Kanpur, and Another.

Decided On : May-15-1964

Court : Allahabad

LAW: section 46(5A, article 226 of the Constitution on September 3, 1957, section 46(5A, section 46(5A, section 44, section 46(5A, Section 21, section 46, section 21, section 46, section 46, section 21, section 46, section 46, section 46, section 21A, section 46, section 21A, section 21A, section 21A, section 21, section 46, section 46, section 21, section 46, section 21, section 21A, section 46, section 46(5A, section 46, section 46, the Code of Civil Procedure, section 46(5A, section 226(3, section 8, section 8, section 21, section 46, Section 8(1, the General Clauses Act, Central Act, section 21, section 8, section 21, section 8, section 21, Section 8, section 46, section 46, section 46, section 46, section 21, section 46, section 21, section 46, section 46, section 21, section 8, section 21, the Factories Act, the Factories Act, section 8, section 48, section 21, section 48, article 226, article 226 of the Constitution, article 226, article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, article 226, article 226 or, article 265 of the Constitution, section 46(5A

PERSON: byR. S. PATHAK J. - The, Gupta J., Gopal Behari, Gopal Behari, S. K. Dhawan, Jethalal Nagji Shah v. Municipal Corporation, Dhawan, Dhawan, Dhawan, Gupta J., Chotalal Shivdas, Raghava Reddy v. Income-tax Officer, Chotalal Shivdas, Raghava Reddy v. Income-tax Officer, Chotalal Shivdas, Dhawan, Dhawan, Dhawan, Mohan Chowdhury, Tripura, G. N. Ojha, Moosa Kazimi v. K. M. Sheriff, Raj Kishan Jain, Tulsi Dass, Dhawan, Dhawan, Bhailal Bai, Dhawan, Dhawan, Dhawan, certiorari

DATE: July 15, 1957, July 29, 1957, 1922, August 9, 1957, August 30, 1957, July 15, 1957, September 5, 1957, September 4, 1957, 1922, 1940, 1948, 1948, 1940, that year, 1940, 1947, 1948, one year, another year, 1922, 1961, 1922, 1961, 1940, 1922, 1961, 1961, 1922, 1961, 1922, 1922, April 1, 1962, 1922, 1961, 1961, 1922, 1961, 1922, 1922, section 46, 1922, 1961, 1961, 1922, 1961, 1934, 1948, 1949, 1922

CARDINAL: 36,611.88, 36,611.88, 33,119.48, 33,119.48, 15,000, 18,119.48, 18,119.48, 15,000, 15,000, 15,000, 15,000, only one, 5A, 5A, 5A, 5A, 1940.After, 5A, one, 5A, 5A, 8), 9, 10, 8), 9, 10, 5A, 5A, one, 3, only one, one, 5A, 5A, 5A, 5A

ORG: the Allahabad Bank Ltd., Government, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Bombay High Court, the Excess Profits Tax Act, Chagla C.J., the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, Manickam, Madura, Inderchand, State, Builders Supply Corporation v. Union of India, Council, Manickam, State, Supply Corporation v. Union of India, Leach C.J., Council, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Excess Profits Tax Act, State of U. P. v. M. P. Singh, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the U. P. Shops, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the Supreme Court, State of, Burma Construction Co., the Allahabad Bank Ltd.

GPE: Kanpur, India, India, Orissa

PRODUCT: Chettiar, Chettiar

NORP: Inderchand

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //