Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ram Lakhan Vs. Income-tax Officer, Kanpur, and Another.

Decided On : Sep-27-1961

Court : Allahabad

LAW: article 226 of the Constitution of India, section 46(5A, section 24B(1, section 46, section 24B(1, section 52, the Code of Civil Procedure, section 24B(1, article 226 of the Constitution, article 226, section 46(5A

DATE: 28th June, 1957, years 1946-47, 28th June, 1952, the 29th January, 1948, 13th June, 1957

PERSON: Ujagar Bhawan, Kanpur, Ram Kishore, Ujagar Lal Maharaj, Shambhu Nath, Asthana, Sri Jagdish Swarup, Sri Jagdish Swarup, Rani Kanno Dai v. B. J. Lacy, Bench, Lordships, Kondala Nagayya, Stratford, Ritson, Jagdish Swarup, Oldfield J., Venkatasubba Rao J., Chetty J., Jagdish Swarup, Jagdish Swarup, Parker, Drummond, Collins, Dunedin, G. Veerappa Pillai v. Raman & Raman Ltd., Sangram Singh v., Election Tribunal, A. M. Allison v. B. L. Sen, Pooran Singh, Agra, Sripat Narain Rai v. Board, Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmed Ishaque, Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hedge, Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale

FAC: Birahana Road, Tirumalai Gandama

CARDINAL: One, 2,08,807.56, 1,00,000 to one, three, 6, 8, 236-37, 262, Only one, 537, two, 533, 536, 621, 540, 110, one

ORG: Shambhu Nath, Brij Kishore, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Shambhu Nath, Appellate, Shambhu Nath, Privy Council, Oolagappa Chetty v. Arbuthnot, Rikhi Ram, High Courts, Easter Development Corporation Limited, the Privy Council, Oolagappa Chetty v. Arbuthnot, Whitney v. Commissioners of Inland Revenue, the Supreme Court

GPE: India, England, London, India, England, England, India, England, Hyatt, England, India, Venkatasubba Rao J., Kotah

NORP: Hindu, Indian, Hindu, English, Hindu, Hari

LOC: Mt. Phool

PRODUCT: Bench, the Full Bench

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English, English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //