Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

S.K. Dutt Vs. Law Book Co. and ors.

Decided On : Dec-08-1953

Court : Allahabad

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 13, the Law Book Company, Indian Partnership Act', Order 10, Rule 2, the Indian Partnership Act, section 14, Section 26, Section 13, the Copyright Act, the Copyright Act, the Copyright Act

PERSON: B. Mukerji, Sri S.K. Dutt, Mukerji, Dutt, Manmotho Nath Mukerji, J.N. Bagga, Barrister, H.D. Suri, Dutt, C. P. C., Sri Jagdish Swarup, M.N. Mukerji, him:'Did, Exs, Works, Juris Secundurn, Ellenborough, Cary v. Kearsley', Kindersley, Cottenham, Kartar Singh, Ladha Singh', W. H. Smith & Son', this:'Q., this:'Q., Sanjiva Rao, asked:'Q., A. Order, question:'Q., this:'Q., this:'Q. Please, this:'Q., --Barfleld, Nicholson, Corelli v. Gray', H.D. Suri, J.N. Bagga, Sri Jagdish Swarup, Sri Jagdish Swarup, facie, Sri Jagdish Swarup

NORP: J.1, publishing.5, English, section?''The, common?'The, words:'I

ORG: Court, the High Court, the Government of India, K.L. Gauba, the Law Book Company, the Law Book Company, Court, Court, Court, Governments, Court, Bench, Court, Court, Bench, Court, Reliance, Macmillan and Co., Ltd- v. K. & J. Cooper', Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordship, Muiray v. Bogue', LJ, Putnam, Sampson & Murdock Co., Seaver-Radford Co.', the House of Lords, Court, Mew's Digest, the Mew's Digest, Court, Court, Court, the Century Digest, the Century Digest, the Century Digest, the Century Digest, Court, Court, defendant?'The, the Court of Chancery, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, Reliance, Court, K.L. Gauba, the Law Book Company, Court, Lindley on Partnership, Lindley, work.46, determination.47, Court

DATE: 1914, the year 1934, the year 1947, July 1948, 1947, 1946, three weeks', 7-12-1951, 28-9-1953, September 22, September 22, 1952, months, months, 29-9-1953, 29-9 1953, this judgment.11, 75, 1802, 1353, 1905, 1905, 1895, ' 20, Yesterday, '35, under 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, '36, 1824, 1924, 1912-13

WORK_OF_ART: 'The Indian Partnership Act, the Law of Partnership, 'Law Book Company's Commentaries of Law & Practice of Partnership & Private Companies, 'The Indian Partnership Act', Copyright Act, 'The Indian Partnership Act'

GPE: India, the United States of America, England, India, S.K., B.L., Lahore, Halsbury, Corpus, Canada, Hanfastaengal, Halsbury, Lind-ley's, Halsbury, Bombay, S.K., India

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 5, 4, 1, 2, 1, 1,200/-, 200, 4., 1, 2, 14, 6-12-1949, 6, 23, 2., 3., 4., 5., 3, 5, 19-11-1951, 1, 2, 797.8, one, 208, 208, 3, two, 797, 22, 9, 8, 22, 1952?'The, 797, two, 1, 2, 18, 228, 170, 680, one, 22, 466, 140, 1, 17, less than half, one, two, at least 9, 17, one, 17, 50, 6, two, 11, 93.15, as many as 797, 16, 18, 157, 323, 6, two, 347, 177, 19, two, two, 1, two, one, 317, 3, 155, 25, 27, 178, 29, 1, two, two, 33, 34, 108, 111, 37, 7, 8, two, 2, 29, 570, two, one, 1, 2, one, two, two, two, one, 311, 862, two, 29, only about 1500, no less than 3000, 797, 114, seven, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, six, only three, one, two, 2-11-1953

ORDINAL: second, first, first

PRODUCT: follows:', question:'Q., LJ Ch 90

TIME: the next morning

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //