Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The State of U.P. Vs. Jaipuria Brothers

Decided On : Mar-03-1960

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 21, Section 6, Section 2, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21, Section 21, Section 21 of the Act, Section 15 of this Amendment Act, Section 21, the Principal Act, Section 9, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 10, Section 11, Section 21, Section 21, Section 21, Section 9, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21, Section 10 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21, Section 23(4, Section 33, Section 33, Section 66(2, Section 33, Section 34, Section 35, Section 10, Section 10, the Sales Tax Act, Section 33, Section 10, Section 9, the Sales Tax Act, the Sales Tax Act

PERSON: R. Dayal, Kanpur, Kanpur, Kanpur, Kanpur, Kanpur, Civil, Khemchand Ramdas, Edulji F. E. Dinshaw, Firm Bangali Mal, Chandra Jain, Agra, A.L.J. 228, Khemchand Ramdas, Lordships, Firm Bangali, Chandra Jain, Agra

ORG: the Sales Tax Officer, Sales Tax, Uttar Pradesh, Messrs Jaipuria Brothers Limited, the Swadeshi Cotton Mills Co., Ltd., U.P., U.P., State, the Sales Tax Officer, the Sales Tax Officer, the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, the Uttar Pradesh Gazette, Explanation-Nothing, Court, Reliance, Mangaldas Motilal & Co, High Court, the Sales Tax Officer, The Revising Authority, Appellate, Assessing Authority, preferred.14, the Revising Authority, Sales Tax, the Assessing Authority, Bombay Presidency & Aden, the High Court, The High Court, Sections 34, Privy Council, Lordships, Sections 34, Sections 34, Lordships, Lordships, Privy Council, Court, Act.22

DATE: the year 1948-49, October, 1946, 1948, the assessment year 1948-49, the 20th of March, 1952, the 31st March, 1952, the assessment year 1948-49, 28th of March, 1955, the 10th of June, 1955, the year 1948-49, 2nd September, 1955, 1955, the year 1948-49, a period of, three years, the 31st of March, 1952, November, 1955, March, 1952, three years, 1954, the 28th of May, 1956, 1956, May 26, 1956, '21, any year, any assessment year, four years, the end of such year, such four years, one year, four years, the 28th of March, 1955, 1938, 1944]12ITR89(Bom, the 28th of March, 1955, 1958, the 28th March, 1955, 1948-49, 31st March, 1952, the 31st March, 1952, appeal.11, the last date, three years, 1955, the 28th March, 1955, 1948-49.15, 1956, 28th March, 1955, 1922, more than one year, the fiscal year ending on 31st March, 1927, more than one year, 35, one year, one year, 28th of March, 1955, 1958

ORDINAL: 5th, 4th, second, first, second

GPE: Clause, Act.3, Bombay, Aden, Messrs, Bombay, Bombay, Messrs

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 1, 10, 9, 2, 2, 6, 414, 1943]11ITR340(Bom, 2, 3, 4, 12, 3, 3, 2, 35, 179, 180, two, 3, 3, 9

TIME: 35 of the Act

PRODUCT: A.L.J. 228, S.T.C. 492

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //