Naseem Banoo, Vs. Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal,

Decided On : Mar-02-2007

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 20 of the Recovery of Debts Due to, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 30, Section 20, Section 20 of the Act, Section 2(a, Section 8, Section 3, Section 20, Section 20(1, Section 30 of the Act, Section 30 of the Act, Section 30, Section 29, Section 25 to 28, Section 30, Section 30, Section 29, Section 30, Section 30, Section 20(1, Section 30, Section 20(1, Sections 17 and 19, Section 30, Section 31, Section 21(4, Section 42, Section 21, Section 41, Section 21(4, Section 41, Section 21, Section 21(4, Section 30, Section 30, Section 20, Section 30, Section 30, Section 20 of the Act, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, the, Amendment Act, Section 30, Section 20, Section 30, Section 30, Section 20 of the Act

PERSON: Ashok Bhushan, Heard Sri Kushal Kant, Counsel, Counsel, Roop Chandra v. State, Anr, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Anr, Counsel, Ohene Moore v., Chandra v. State of Punjab, Anr, Anr, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Anr, Anr, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Anr, Counsel, Hari Kishen v., Amar Nath, All Ahmed v. Roshan Das

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 3.2, 224, 348, 2, 272, 1, 1, 2, 17.1.2000, 1, 5, 4, 4, 30, 21, 552, 96, 2002]2SCR450, only one, 22, 43, 403, 52, 8, 17

ORG: 3,9,2002, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Court, Reliance, Division Bench, Delhi High Court, Continental Construction Ltd., Ors, State Bank of India, Ors.4, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, Union of India, the Dobt Recovery Tribunal Under Section 30, Appellate Tribunal', Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal:Notwithstanding, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, The Privy Council, Privy Council, Akessch Tayee, Court of Justice, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal Under Section 20(1, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, East Punjab Holdings ( Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation, the Settlement Officer (Consolidation, the State Government, the State Government, The State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the apex Court, Government, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal Under Section 20, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal Under Section 20, Tribunal, Tribunal Under Section 20.14, Court in, Union of India, Tribunal, Sections 25, Tribunal, Delhi High Court, Continental Construction Ltd., Ors, State Bank of India and Ors, The Delhi High Court, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal', the Supreme Court, Union of India, DLT, SC, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Delhi High Court Bar Association, Learned Counsel, the Tribunal, Tribunal

DATE: 30.11,2006, 2002, 1993, 30.11.2006, 2004, 30.11,2001, 30.11.2006, 2002, thirty days, thirty days, 1935, 1948, sixty days, 45 days, thirty days.13, 2000, 28, 22:21, 2000, 2002, 2002, 2000, 2000, 1921, 1950, 1972, 30.11.2006, 30.11.2006

PRODUCT: Debt Recovery, Prasad v. Ashwani Prasad

GPE: II, Tribunal.10, A.I.R., Roop, I.L.R., Counsel

TIME: 11:11

NORP: judgement:30

ORDINAL: first, second, second, second