The Indian Minerals Co. Vs. the Northern India Lime Marketing Association

Decided On : Nov-28-1957

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 39(1)(iv, the Arbitration Act, Section 39(1)(vi, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 33, the Arbitration Act, Section 20 of the Act, Section 20, Section 33 of the Act, Section 20(4, the Arbitration Act, Section 20(4, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 41, the Arbitration Act of 1940, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 44.The, Section 41, Section 23(2, Section 32, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Chapter II, Section 31(1, Section 16(a, Section 30, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 15, the Arbitration Act, Section 16 of the Act, Section 17 of the Act, Section 39(1)(vi, Section 104(1, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Arbitration Act, Section 30.The, the Arbitration Act, Section 104 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Arbitration Act of 1940, Section 39, Section 30, Section 17, Section 39, Section 17, Section 39, Section 30, Section 35, Section 30, Section 17, Section 39, Section 17, Section 39, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act

PERSON: D.N. Roy, J.1, Brij Lal Suri, Dehara Dun, Brij Lal Suri, Dehra Dun, Brij Lal Suri, Hind, Dehra Dun, F. A. F. O. No., Ex, Ex, Ex, Ex, N. W. F. P., Ex, Ex, Sri Brij, Lal Suri, Dehara Dun, Sri Brij, Lal Suri, Nos, Nos, Kunzru, Chandra Karmakar v., Panchanan Karmakar ILR, Jurisdiction, Brij Lal Suri, John Stuart, Rose, Dohad, Randall v. Randall, Malida Koer, Ramji Ram, Salig Ram, Cal L. J. 188, Harakh Ram, Lakshmi Ram, Khub Lal v. Bishambhar Sahai, Chhabba Lal v. Kallu Lal, Iqbal Ahmad, Mariam Bibi v. Amna Bibi, Schedule III, Mahton, Sanichar Mahton, Pat 207, Sri M. S. Saxena, M. S. Saxena, Sri M. S. Saxena, F. A. F. O. No.

CARDINAL: two, 199, 14-6-1951, 257, 30, 14, 30, 24, One, 186, two, 3-8-1950, two, 14-6-1951, 1, 2, two, 2, five, 2, about six, 1, 1, 2, 2, 14-6-1951, 1, 3, 186, 24, 14, 1, 3, 5, 14, 2, 1, 3, 5, 1, A).The, 17, 17, two, 3 ..............4, 1, 14, 200, 1, five, three, one, 13, 14, one, one, one, 43, 108, 384, one, 52, 116, 15, 257, 1, one, one, 257, 500/-, thirty, thirty, one, one, 199, 257, 14

DATE: 1940, 1951, 1953, 1940, every month, 20-9-1942, the next day, 21-9-1942, the 20th September, six months, 24-9-1942, the 21st September, 1948, 20-9-1942, 21-9-1942, 21-9-1942, 1948, 1946, 1379, 1858, 1805, 7 East 81, it.11, 1940, 1953, 1899, 1953, 18-11-1943, 21-9-1942, six months, 24-9-1942, six months, 1951, 1953

ORG: the Indian Minerals Company, Sons, Northern India Lime Marketing Association, Sons, Northern India Lime Marketing Association, the Indian Minerals Company, Maihar, Madhya Pradesh, the Indian Minerals Company, Court, Dehra Dun, Court, Court, Dehra Dun, Court, Civil, Dohad, contract?2, Sons, the Northern India Lime Marketing Association, Northern India Lime Marketing Association, Court, the Indian Minerals Company, the High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Order VI, Plaintiff, Order VI, and(b, it', Sons, the Northern India Lime Marketing Association, remarked:'A, ILR, Court, Court, Martin, ILR, AIR 1928 Bom 49, the Privy Council, Lordships, Court, Court, Court, Court, Clauses, Section 30(1, Court, Court, Court, the Patna High Court, AIR, the Indian Minerals Company, the Northern India Lime Marketing Association, the Indian Minerals Company, the Indian Minerals Company, the Indian Minerals Company, the Indian Minerals Company, the Northern India Lime Marketing, the Northern India Lime Marketing Association, the Northern India Lime Marketing Association

LOC: Central India

FAC: Dehra Dun, Dehra Dun, Dehra Dun, Dehra Dun, Moradabad-Delhi, Bhogilal Purshottam v.

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, second, first

NORP: Punjab, Hindu, Rules, Hindu

GPE: Delhi, Ex, Piercy v. Young, Kemp, Singh, Amritlal, Sheocharan

LANGUAGE: English