Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mst. Sarju Bai Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax.

Decided On : Apr-30-1946

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 66, Section 2, Section 2, Section 4, Section 146, Section 2, Section 67, Section 2, Section 67, the Section 2, Section 2, Section 4, Section 6 of the Act

CARDINAL: three, three, two, three, two, 1, only six, 1, 3, one, almost one, at least two, two, 1, 1, one, three, 1, two, 1, 3, two, twelve, twelve, ten thousand, two, 10,000, two, 519, three, 100

PRODUCT: Mst

PERSON: Sarju Bai, Jhansi, Manohar Lall, Kirk, Radhika Mohan Roy Wards Estate, Harold Derbyshire, Mukherjee, Singh, Radhika Mohan Roy Wards Estate, Indian Income-tax Act, facie salami, salami

DATE: year 1939-40 and, the year 1939-40, arrear, 1942, 1940, 1885, the year, the year, the 30th January, 1941, the 16th October, 1942, one months

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, first, second, second, first, second, second

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

ORG: the United Provinces Tenancy Act, the United Provinces Tenancy Act, United Provinces, the High Court, Patna, the Patna High Court, Srimati Lakshmi Daiji, the High Court, Interest, Maharaja Bahadur Ram Ran Vijay, Court, the Bihar Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Calcutta High Court, Bengal Tenancy Act, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Privy Council, Raja Bahadur Kamakshya Narain, Lordships, Lordships, Department

FAC: Sri Ramchandra Dev v. Commissioner of Income-tax

GPE: Bihar, Orissa, Bihar, Bihar, nazrana, Singh, Bihar, Orissa

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //