Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Khusal Chand NaraIn Das (Huf) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Decided On : May-06-1991
Court : Allahabad
LAW: Chapter XX-C, Section 64, the Tax Recovery Officer, Chapter XX-C, Section 269UF, Section 269UE, the Estate Duty Act, Estate Duty Act, Section 269UG
PERSON: Jeevan Reddy, Mohammed Ibrahim, Kanpur, Tahsildar, Kanpur, Kanpur, Gift, Gift, Kanpur
DATE: January 22, 1991, September 20, 1988, two months, the end of the month, February 28, 1990, February 19, 1990, January 23, 1990, March 21, 1990, 1954, December, 1983, March 29, 1990, November 12, 1990, July 21, 1986, January 22, 1991, November 12, 1990, January 22, 1991, one month, the end of the month, 1957, 27 to 1957, 1958, 18 of 1958, 1953, 34 of 1953, 1964, 7 of 1964, one month, two months, one week, four days
ORG: Appropriate Authority, Section 269UG, Section 269UD, the 'Tax Recovery Officer, the Inspector of Income-tax, Section 269UG, Section 269UG, the Central Government, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, the Central Government, the Central Government, Department, Section 269UG
GPE: Lucknow, Kanpur
CARDINAL: one, 24, 3, 1, 2, 3., 4., 5., 6., 1, 1, 1, 6, 8, 1, 1, 2., 3, 1, 4, 9, 10
LOC: Tahsildar, Tahsildar
ORDINAL: first
TIME: under this Act
PRODUCT: Section 269UF, Section 269UF