Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Khusal Chand NaraIn Das (Huf) Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Decided On : May-06-1991

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Chapter XX-C, Section 64, the Tax Recovery Officer, Chapter XX-C, Section 269UF, Section 269UE, the Estate Duty Act, Estate Duty Act, Section 269UG

PERSON: Jeevan Reddy, Mohammed Ibrahim, Kanpur, Tahsildar, Kanpur, Kanpur, Gift, Gift, Kanpur

DATE: January 22, 1991, September 20, 1988, two months, the end of the month, February 28, 1990, February 19, 1990, January 23, 1990, March 21, 1990, 1954, December, 1983, March 29, 1990, November 12, 1990, July 21, 1986, January 22, 1991, November 12, 1990, January 22, 1991, one month, the end of the month, 1957, 27 to 1957, 1958, 18 of 1958, 1953, 34 of 1953, 1964, 7 of 1964, one month, two months, one week, four days

ORG: Appropriate Authority, Section 269UG, Section 269UD, the 'Tax Recovery Officer, the Inspector of Income-tax, Section 269UG, Section 269UG, the Central Government, the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, the Central Government, the Central Government, Department, Section 269UG

GPE: Lucknow, Kanpur

CARDINAL: one, 24, 3, 1, 2, 3., 4., 5., 6., 1, 1, 1, 6, 8, 1, 1, 2., 3, 1, 4, 9, 10

LOC: Tahsildar, Tahsildar

ORDINAL: first

TIME: under this Act

PRODUCT: Section 269UF, Section 269UF

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //