Phool Chand Bajrang Lal and anr. Vs. Income-tax Officer, b-ward and anr.

Decided On : Nov-24-1976

Court : Allahabad

LAW: article 226 of the Constitution, Section 148, Section 147(a, Section 147(a, Section 139, Section 148(2, Section 148, Section 34 of the Act of, Section 147 of the Act of, Section 34, Section 34(1)(b, Section 147(a, Section 148, Section 151 of the Act, Section 147, Section 148.'30, Section 148.31

DATE: 1961, years 1963-64 to 1968-69, the assessment year 1963-64, May 19, 1962, May 25, 1962, November 15, 1963, May 19, 1962, each of the years 1963-64, August 26, 1971, the year 1963-64, the assessment year 1965-66, a week, November 25, 1972, the years 1963-64, those years, 30 days, June 26, 1972, the year 1963-64, September 26, the assessment year 1963-64, February 10, 1972, February 10, 1971, January 1, 1972, February 10, 1972, February 10, 1971, January 1,1972, February 7, four years, a period of, eight years, the assessment year, that year, four years, years, 1971]79ITR603(SC, '10, 1970, 1962-63, 1963-64, 1964-65, ' 11, May 19, 1970, the years 1965-66/1966-67, 1969-70, July 7, 1970, 1971]79ITR603(SC, July 7, 1970, May 19, 1970, about May 19, 1962, about May 19, 1962, the year 1958-59, year-1958-59, April 1, 1957, to March 31, 1958, February 13, 1967, a few weeks, months, April 1, 1957, to March 31, 1958, the particular year, 1922, 1948, 1961, July 7, 1970, 1962-63, 1963-64, 1964-65, years 1962-63 to 1964-65, May 19, 1962, years, years 1962-63 to 1964-65, about May 19, 1962, July 7, 1970, years 1962-63 to 1964-65, years 1962-63 to 1964-65, about May 19, 1962, May 19, 1962, 1971]79ITR609(SC, the year 1949-50, the previous year, the assessment year 1950-51the, 1948, 1922, the year 1949-50, that year, the year 1949-50, 1971]79ITR609(SC, 1971]79ITR609(SC, '25, 1971]79ITR609(SC, the earlier year, 1971]79ITR609(SC, 1971]79ITR603(SC, 1971]79ITR603(SC

CARDINAL: 1, 50,000, 50,000, 50,000, 50,000, 50,000, 1973.6, 1972.7, 1976]103ITR437(SC, two, 1, 2, 8, three, 607, 50,000, 7, 19-5-, 306, 306, 306.12, 50,000, 50,000, 1976]103ITR437(SC, 14, 1976]103ITR437(SC, one, 448, 2,500, one, 15, 1976]103ITR437(SC, 1976]103ITR437(SC, 1976]103ITR437(SC, three, 2,500, 17, 50,000, 50,000.18, 1976]103ITR437(SC, 1976]103ITR437(SC, three, 1976]103ITR437(SC, 50,000, 50,000, 87,937, half, one, 87,937, 1,62,155, 81,077, 1,62,155, 24, 1975]99ITR296(Cal, 1975]99ITR296(Cal, 608):'We

ORG: ITO, M/s. Jain Finance Distributors, Private) Ltd., Calcutta, ITO, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, inter alia, Calcutta, inter alia, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, Commissioned, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, ITO, The Supreme Court, ITO, The Supreme Court, report:'All, ITO, ITO, the Commissioner of Income-tax, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, ITO, Calcutta, M/s. Jain Finance Distributors, Private Ltd., Sudhir Chatterji St., Jain Finance Distributors, India Private Ltd, the Confession of Shri Tara Chand Surana, Jain Finance Distributors, ITO, ITO, Phoolchand, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, Calcutta, Calcutta, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, ITO, Chhugamal Rajpal's, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, the Calcutta Company, ITO, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, ITO, Lakhmeni Mewal Das's, the Supreme Court, Lakhmani Mewal Das's, ITO, ITO, the Supreme Court, ITO, Lakhmani Mewal Das's, the Supreme Court, ITO, Lakhmani Mewal Das'S, the Supreme Court, Calcutta, ITO, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Lakhmani Mewal Das's, the Supreme Court, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Lakhmani Mewal Das's, Lakhmani Mewal Das's, the Supreme Court, Calcutta, Supreme Court, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, I.T.O., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Burlop Dealers Ltd., H. Manory Ltd., H. Manory Ltd., Manory Ltd., fromH. Manory Ltd., ITO, H. ManoryLtd, ITO, ITO, RatiramTansukhrai, ITO, TheSupreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, High Courts, ITO, Arun, Lakhmani Mewal Das v. Income-tax Officer, the Supreme Court, Burlop Dealers Ltd.'s, Lordship, the Supreme Court, Burlop Dealers Ltd.'s, Lordships, Burlap Dealers Ltd.'s, the Supreme Court, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, Calcutta, Calcutta, the Supreme Court, Burlop Dealers Ltd.'s, ITO, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, Calcutta, ITO, ITO, ITO, the Supreme Court, ITO, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, ITO, the Supreme Court, ITO, the Supreme Court, ITO, ITO

GPE: India, Bihar, Orissa, K Ward, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, Ratiram Tansukhrai, Ratiram Tansukhrai

PERSON: Sri R.K. Gulati, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, S.P. Chaliha, Chowringhee Square, Shri Surana, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, Mohansingh Kanayalal, Mohansingh Kanayalal, Mohansingh Kanayalal, theITO, Mohansingh Kanayalal, Mohansingh Kanayalal, Mohansingh Kanayalal, Mohansingh Kanayalal, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, Ratiram Tansukhrai, theITO, Ratiram Tansukhrai, K. Mukherjea J., Ratiram Tansukhrai, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, Sri Gulati, Shri Gulati

ORDINAL: first, first

NORP: Chhugamal, Indian, Chhugamal, Chhugamal

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, the Full Bench

EVENT: P-306/A.

TIME: 1,75,875

QUANTITY: 87,937 allowedin