Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Raj Kishore Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Decided On : Nov-19-1953

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Rule 465, Section 240(3, Article 310 of the Constitution of India, Article 311(1, Rule 465, Rule 465, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article his removal, Rule 485, Constitution, Rule 465 of the Civil Service Regulations, Article 311.11, Article 311, Section 96-B, Section 96, Rule 55, Section 96-B ', Act, Section 240(3, Section 240, Constitution, Constitution, Article 311.The, Article 311(2, Rule 56, Rule 465, Article 311, Rule 465, Rule 465, Article 311, Rule 465, Rule 465, Section 32(3, the Interpretation Act, Section 21, Section 27, Rule 485, Constitution, Article 16 of the Constitution, Clause, Article 16, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 310, Article 310, Article 14.21, Article 311, Article 310, Article 310 and Clause, Article 311, Article 311, Article 14, Article 310, Article 14, Article 310, Article 14, Article 310, Article 14, Article 310, Article 14, Article 14.22

ORG: Government, the Director of Agriculture, Uttar Pradesh, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, the Agriculture College of Kanpur, Government, Government, the Minister for Agriculture and Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Court, Government, Government, Government, the Civil Service Regulations, the Uttar Pradesh, Government, Government, Government in theAdministrative Department, the Government of India Act, Government, the Civil Services, Classification Control and Appeal, Government, the Civil Services, Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, the Heads of Departments, Heads, the Administrative Department, the Head of Department, Government, the Administrative Department of Government, Government, State, State, State, State, State, tne Government, the Civil Service Regulations, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Court, the Government of India Act, Crown, Statute, The Government of India Act, Crown, Act, State, the Government of India Act, the Civil Service (, Control and Appeal) Rules, Government, Government, Government, the Privy Council, Crown, Government, Government, Crown, Government, Government, State, State, Government of India Act, Crown, Civil, the Government of India Act, the Privy Council, Government, Crown, State, Court, Saurashtra, AIR 1952 Sau 49, The State of Travancore Cochin', Trav-Co., the Supreme Court, Court, the Pepsu Court, Court, State, AIR 1952 Pepsu, AIR 1952, Shambhu, AIR 1952, AnupSingh, State, AIR 1953 Fepsu, the Supreme Court, Bench, correct.14, the Government of United Provinces, Civil, Civil, Government, Government, Government, Government, the Administrative Department, Government, Government, Government, Administrative Rule, Administrative, State, State, Government, Privy Council, the Government of India Act, State, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Government, Government, Civil, Government, State, State, State, Government, Government, Government, Government, Government, State, Government, State, specialibus, Judicial Committee, AC 748, Legislature, Government, State, Government, Notifications and Rules

PERSON: Raj Kishore, Rs, Sri J. P. Verma, Stenographer, follows:'GOVERNMENT, G. O. No., Notifications, Articles 14, Shyam Lal v. State of U. P. : AIR1954All235, Dismissal, Venkata Rao v. Secy, I. M. Lall, Kewalmal Singh, Heta Ram, Bholanath Jstashanker', Varadaraja Iyer, Narayana Iyer v., Rama Iyer v., Ishar Das v. State, Shyam Lal's, Article,16, Statutes, Narayan Sahi, Articles 310, Barker v. Edgar', Randhir Singh

DATE: the year 1923, 1951, June 1952, May 1953, 15th April 1953, 18th April 1953, more than 25 years, 7 days, April 25, 1953, 30 years, 50 years of age, 6-11-1953, 29th May 1953, four months', 20-7-1953, 32/- per month, the 20th August 1953.3, the age of 55 years, the age of 60 years, 1948, 25 years, the age of 50 years, 25 years, the year 1948, 30 years, May 3, 1949, 1933, Rule 55, 25 years, the age of 50 years, the six months ending June 30 and December 31, 25 years', the age of 50 years, the half year, 25 years, December 30, 1962, 25 years', 1949, 25 years, May 3, 1949, 1923, those days, the year 1948, 1915, 1919, 0043/1936, 1935, 1935, 55, 69, 1948, 55 years, the age of 55 years, 25 years, 25 years, 1949, 1952, 1949, 1952, 0043/1936, the year 1943, 1923, 1919, 1923, 1889, 25 years, 25 years, 25 years, 25 years, 25 years, 25 years, 1898

CARDINAL: 300-20-400, 1, 2, 2, 350, 2, 350, 15-4-1953, 28, 23,000/-besides, 31/-, 465, 2, 25, 0-1297/11, 49, two, 2, 2, 465, 3, 16, 9, 49, Three, 3, two, one, 140, 1953]4SCR655, four, 148, 152, 465, two, 465, 465, 2, two, two, 10, 465, 1, 2, 2, 1, 465, one, 1953]4SCR1129, 311, two, 1, 2, 2, 2, 1, 2, 754, one

GPE: India, India, Council, Rangachari, India, India, K.R., Fatiala, East Punjab States Union', Clause

ORDINAL: First, second, second, third, fourth

FAC: Chandra Anand v. Union of India

PRODUCT: Rule 455, Rule 465, Crown, Rule 435, Rule 485, Rule 405

LANGUAGE: English

NORP: Indian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //