Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. J.K. Srivastava

Decided On : Jan-12-1984

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 27(3, the W.T. Act, Rule 2, Section 4(1)(b, Section 27(1, Section 4(1)(b, Section 27(3, Section 4(1)(b, Section 21AA, the W.T. Act, the Finance Act, Section 21AA, Section 18 or Section 18A, Section 5, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 21AA, Section 21AA, the I.T. Act, Section 27(3, Section 21AA

CARDINAL: 1, eight, half, half, 1966]60ITR188(SC, 1970]77ITR20(SC, 1980]122ITR38(SC, two, 1983]142ITR586(All, two, 1979]117ITR1(SC, 2, 1, 3, 2, 1, 4, 5, 4, 1, 10, 131, 119, 21.1, 21.2, 21.3, 1, 11, 1984]150ITR453(All, 1981]131ITR597(SC, 1971]82ITR913(SC, 1984]150ITR453(All, two, 2, 1983]142ITR586(All, 14, 15, two

DATE: years, 1957, 1976-77, December 15, 1954, years 1954-55 and, 1956-57, years, 1981, 1966]60ITR428(SC, January 16, 1941, April 1, 1981, '21AA.(1, an assessment year, 1981, June 29, 1981, 1981, 1957, April 1, 1981, April 3, 1981, 1961

ORG: The Appellate Tribunal, Department, Deparment, Department, the Appellate Tribunal, AAC, WTO, Sri J.K. Srivastava, WTO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Board, Finance, Budget, Tribunal, Board, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, CIT, CIT, Indian Mica Supply Co. P. Ltd., CGT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Division Bench, Prem Lata Agarwal, Department, Department, Board, the Supreme Court, Gestetner Duplicators P. Ltd., CIT, the Central Board of Revenue, Board, Department, Department, W.T., the Appellate Tribunal, the Tribunal on Section 4(1)(b, Appellate, the Commissioner (Appeals, ITR, Section 4(1)(b, Department, CIT v. Novelty Trading Corporation, Tribunal, Department, K.P. Varghese v. ITO, Ellerman Lines Ltd., CIT, Department, CIT, Novelty Trading Corporation, Section 35B, Department, Board, Department, Prem Lata Agarwal, the Appellate Tribunal, Department, Department

PERSON: Sri R.S. Dhawan, Sri J. P. Srivastava, Sri V.K. Srivastava, Sri J. K. Srivastava, Sri J. P. Srivastava, Sri V.K. Srivastava, Rule 2, Bill, Rule 2, Chander Bhan Harbhajan Lal, Mathura Prasad v. CIT, Kusumben D. Mahadevia, Sri R.S. Dhawan, Rule 2, Dhawan, Sri Dhawan, Appendix, Sri J. P. Srivastava, Sri, Dhawan

NORP: Memo, Hindu, Hindu

MONEY: 50 per cent, three per cent, 3 per cent, 75 per cent

GPE: India, India, Clauses, xxvii, Us, India, India

PRODUCT: Circular

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //