Ramesh Chandra and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Decided On : Jan-20-2009

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 6, Section 6, the U.P.C.H. Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 6, Section 4 or 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6 and Rule 17, Section 6, Section 3, Section 3 of the Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Rule 17, Section 6, Section 6 of the Act, Section 4, Section 6 of U.P.C.H. Act, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6 of the Act, Rule 17, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4 or 6, Section 6 of the Act, Section 9, Section 52, Section 30, Section 52, Section 6 of the Act, Section 30, Section 6 of the Act, Section 52, Section 52, Section 30, Section 30, Section 52, Section 6 of the Act, Section 30, Section 52 of the Act, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6 of the Act, Section 30, Section 30, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6, Section 30 of the Act.28, Section 52, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6, Section 6 of the Act

PERSON: Prakash Krishna, Bachgaon, Bhidarwa, Julendhi, Tehsil Siyana, District Bulandshahr, Tehsil Khair, District Aligarh, Tehsil Khair, District Aligarh, Aligarh, Smt, Mahila Kalyan Nigam, Aligarh, Shri Ajit Singh, Chaudhari Charan Singh, Indian Lok Dal, Bhoo Mafias, Daya Ram, Nos, Charan Singh, Shri Ajit Singh, Tehsildar, Aligarh, Haryana, Haryana, Naib Tehsildar, Khair, Haryana, Haryana, Gharbara, Gharbara, Tehsildar, Aligarh, Shri B. B. Paul, Nos, Bhoo Mafias, Shri B. D. Mandhyan, Siya Ram, Anr, Jalalabad, Haryana, Dixit Award, Dixit Award, Shri B. B. Paul, Nos, Mahila Kalyan Nigam, Ajit Singh, Indian Lok Dal, Aligarh, S.D.M. Khair, Nos, Aligarh, Admn, Raipur, Tehsil Khair, District Aligarh, Tehsil Khair, District Aligarh, Tehsil Khair, District Aligarh, Rule, Rule, Jagpal Singh v. D.D.C. 2000, AWC, Usman Gani v. State, Suraj Bhan v. D.C. :, Tanseem Bano v. State, Kishan Singh, Devi Das v. State of Punjab, Jeevan Singh v. State, Jagpal Singh v. D.D.C., Usman Gani v. State

NORP: J.1, Hon'ble, Hon'ble, Ashwani, Hon'ble, Hon'ble

ORG: The Writ Petition (P.I.L., U.P., Lucknow under Section 6, P.I.L., the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, Pargana Tappal, Pargana Tappal, withdrawn.9, State, U.P., Parliament, National, Court, Court, the Consolidation of Holdings Act, U.P., the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, U.P., State, the Dixit Award, the Consolidation Office, Upziladhikari, River Yamuna, U.P., U.P., the Dixit Award, River Yamuna, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khair, P.I.L., the Naib Tehsildar, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Additional District Magistrate, petition.14, Court, Court, Court, Division Bench, Agricultural, Industrial Syndicate, Ltd., Collector, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Court, Agricultural, Industrial Syndicate Ltd., The U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, Uttar Pradesh, the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, State, the State Government, the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, Court, Shyam Sunder and Ors, State, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Smt, Collector, Court, the Settlement Officer, Consolidation, the Naib Tehsildar, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Additional District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, Court, Pargana Tappal, Pargana Tappal, Pargana Tappal, P.I.L. (Public Interest Litigation, Court, Agricultural, Industrial Syndicate, Ltd., Division Bench, Court, the State Government, Court, the State Government, the High Court, Legislature, The High Court, the State Government, the State Government, U.P. 1984 RD, U.P., State of Bihar, U.P., Division Bench, Agricultural, Industrial Syndicate Ltd., Court, Court, the Apex Court, Agricultural, Industrial Syndicate, Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, Agricultural, Industrial Syndicate Ltd., Court, Court, Court, U.P., U.P. Public Services Commission, Cordozo, the State Government, U.P., U.P., Division Bench, Agricultural, Industrial Syndicate, Ltd., Division Bench, Division Bench, Agricultural, Industrial Syndicate, Ltd., Division Bench, Neelam Chaudhary, Sazid

DATE: 2005, 2006, 57395, 2008, 25th July, 2008, 2008, 25th October, 2007, 10th October, 1992, 2005, 24th of March, 2005, 21st of September, 1995, 2003, 16th of April, 2004, 24th of March, 2005, 28th of August, 2004, August, 2004, August, 2004, August, 2004, 28th of August, 2004, 21st of September, 1995, 11th February, August, 2004, 4th of January, 2005, 11th February., 2005, 28th December, 2004, 1976, 1953, 1950, 1959, September 21,1995, five years, 6th of July, 2005, August, 2004, 13th August, 2004, 24.5.2004, 28th December, 2004, 4th January, 2005, 10th February, 2005, 11th February, 2005, 16th of April, 2004, 1954, March 25, 1964, 1999, 2146, 454;5, 1952, 6th of October, 1967, 17th of May, 1968, 6th of July, 2005, 1990, 1999

GPE: Pargana, Tehsil, District Mathura, Kuchesar, Pargana, Gharbara, Gharbara, New Delhi, Gharbara, Lucknow, India, Gharbara, Gharbara, the State of, Tajammul Hussain v., Counsel, New Delhi, Gharbara, Gharbara, Gharbara, Jiwan, Singh v. State, NOC);3, Jiwan, Singh v. State, Smt, Suraj, Bhan v. D.C.

CARDINAL: 21.7.2005.3, 58410, eight, 2, One, one, 2, 4, 2005.10, 3, 6, 22, one, 6, 52,000, about 6,000, 90, 10, 4, 5, 6, 35, 2, 4, 9A, 49, 209.17, 4, 6, 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, two, 1, one, 35709, 2000.20, eight, 1, 24.3.2005, one, one, 30, 4, 2001(3)AWC2149, 4, 6, 1, 630.26, 1967]3SCR557, 2, 1, 2, 1, one, one, 6, 7, 117

WORK_OF_ART: The Writ Petition No

ORDINAL: 4th, 5th, 24th, 4th, 5th, first

PRODUCT: 2,374.96, Kumar

QUANTITY: 1958.78 hectares.12

LOC: Yamuna River

FAC: Deo Nath Kewat