Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Smt. Phoolmati Devi
Decided On : Mar-03-1983
Court : Allahabad
LAW: Section 269H, the I.T. Act, Section 269D, the I.T. Act, Section 269D, the I.T. Act, Section 269D(2)(a, the I.T. Act, Section 292B, the I.T. Act
ORG: K.C. Agarwal, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Appellate Tribunal, Misri Pokhra, Smt, Deleep Nagar, Smt, the I.T. Dept, Smt, IAC, Chap, Smt, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Smt, Tribunal, The Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, the Competent Authority, Chap, the Competent Authority, Smt, the Competent Authority, Legislature, Smt, The Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act
CARDINAL: 1, 1, minor.2, 80,000, 45,000, 73,198, 45,000, 3, 2)(a, 2, 1, transferee, 6, 2, 1978]113ITR167(AP, 1
LOC: Varanasi
PERSON: Kumud Kumari, Phoolmati Devi, Jagdish Mohan, Jagdish Mohan, Gazette, Gazette, Phoolmati Devi, Lucknow, Phoolmati Devi, Jagdish Mohan, Phoolmati Devi, Phoolmati Devi, Jagdish Mohan, Jagdish Mohan, Jagdish Mohan, Phoolmati Devi, Phoolmati Devi, Jagdish Mohan, Jagdish Mohan, Jagdish Mohan, Jaggi Ram, Mohammed Mahoob Ali Saheb v. IAC, Ahisa Begum, Mohammedan, Jagdish Mohan, Jagdish Mohan
GPE: Deoria
DATE: December 5, 1973, December 22, 1973, 31st October, 1975, 1922, 1957, 1975, 1st October, 1975
PERCENT: about 60%
NORP: Indian, Hindu, Hindus
WORK_OF_ART: Jagdish Mohan, Jagdish Mohan, Jagdish Mohan