Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hardayal Vs. District Judge, Jhansi and ors.

Decided On : Mar-24-1972

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 4, the Indian Forest Act, Section 6, Indian Forest Act, Section 20, the Indian Forest Act, Section 4/6, the Indian Forest Act, Section 6, Section 6, the Indian Forest Act, Section 6 of the Act, Article 228 of the Constitution, Section 6, the Indian Forest Act, Section 6, the Forest Act, Section 4, Section 6, the Limitation Act.6, Section 6, the Forest Settlement Officer, Section 9, Section 6, Section 7, Section 20, Section 6, Section 20, Section 6, Section 6, Section 9, Section 6, Section 6, Section 9, Section 6, Section 9, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6.9

PERSON: Seth, Tehsil Kalpi, Hardayal, Sirdar, Jhansi Division, Jhansi

NORP: J.1

ORG: Dhaman, the Forest Department, The Divisional Forest, the State Government, the Forest Settlement Officer, Learned Counsel, the Divisional Forest, the Forest Settlement Officer, the Divisional Forest Officer, Authority, District Judge, the Forest Settlement Officer, the Forest Settlement Officer, the Forest Settlement Officer, the Forest Settlement Officer, Legislature, the Forest Settlement, the Divisional Forest Officer, the Divisional Forest, the Forest Settlement Officer, District Judge

DATE: September 1954, the end of June, 1962, 9th of July, 1962, three months, May 1960, less than three months, less than three months, 20th March, 1970

LOC: the District Judge

ORDINAL: first

CARDINAL: two

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //