Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Apr-17-2003

Court : Allahabad

LAW: the Companies Act, Section 41, Rule 10 of the U. P. Excise Rules, Rule 16, Rule 16, Section 206C, Section 206C, Section 206C, Section 41, Section 206C, State Act, Section 44AC and Section 206C, Section 44AC and Section 206C of the Act, Section 44AC, Section 206C, Section 44AC(1)(a, the Amending Act, Section 44AC, State Act, the Full Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court, Section 206C., Section 264, the Explanation to Section 206C, the State Act, the Explanation to Section 206C, the Explanation to Section 206C, the Central Excise Act, Section 119 of the Income-tax Act.22

PERSON: M. Katju, Section 44AC

NORP: J.1, CL-2A., Punjab, Punjab, Punjab

DATE: March 22, 2002, May 7, 2002, the excise year 2001-2002, 2001, 2001, 2001, March 16, 2001, October 20, 2001, March 31, 2001, March 30, 2002, 1977, March 22, 2002, April 30, 2002, May 2, 2002, March 22, 2002, April 30, 2002, May 2, 2002, or(iii, April 1, 1992, Section 44AC(1)(a, 1988, December 16, 1988, the year 1988, the year 1989, April 1, 1989, May 4, 1990, 1990, 1989, March 22, 2002, May 7, 2002, May 7, 2002, 38, a subsequent year, June 27, 2002, June 27, 2002, June 27, 2002, March 16, 2001, June 27, 2002, March 22, 2002, May 7, 2002

ORG: TDS, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Saharanpur, U.P. Excise, the U. P. Excise (Settlement of Wholesale Shop of Country Liquor) Rules, the U. P. Excise (Settlement of Licenses for Retail Sale of Country Liquor, the Retail Rules, Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, the Wholesale Rules, State, WSI Register, State, the Country Liquor Rules, the District Level Committee, the State Government, BL, TCS, the State of U. P., the District Committee, Finance, Government of India, Central Board of Direct Taxes, State, Section 4A, TDS, Uttar Pradesh, State, The Central Board of Direct Taxes, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, ITR, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the State Government, Saini, Co. v. Union of India, Haryana High Court, K.K. Mittal and Co. v. Union of India, SLP, the Supreme Court, K.K. Mittal and Co. v. Union of India, Haryana High Court, Chandigarh Distillers and, Bottlers Ltd. v. Union of India, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, Saini, Co. v. Union of India, TDS, petition.14, the Himachal Pradesh, Haryana High Court, State, CL-5C, the Union of India, State, Government, TDS, Co. v. Union of India, K.K. Mittal and Co., the State Government, the State Government/ Excise, the Ministry of Finance, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Dhiren Chemical Industries, Department, the Supreme Court, the Central Board, the Central Board of Direct Taxes

GPE: Muzaffarnagar, Muzaffarnagar, Pilkhani, New Delhi, Muzaffarnagar, Muzaffarnagar, Saini

CARDINAL: 6, 12, 2, 1, 2, 3, 12, 4, 13, 16, 5, 17, 6, 7, 23, 24, 1, 12, 170, 187, 8, 184, 91, 9, 12, 37, 44, 3, 13, 14, 15, 22, 4, 8, 12, 2002]254ITR554(SC, 11, 6, 12

QUANTITY: 200 ml

PRODUCT: Section 44AC, L-13