Skip to content

Beni Prasad Sidh Gopal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided On : May-16-1983

Court : Allahabad

LAW:

Section 256(1, Section 256(1, Section 36, the I.T. Act, Section 4, Section 2, Section 145, Section 256

PERSON:

R.M. Sahai, B.R. Kothi, Kanpur, B.R. Sons, Order, B. R. Sons, Asarh Sudi 2

NORP:

J.1, I.T.R., I.T.R., I.T.R.

DATE:

1959-60, 1960-61, 1982, 1961-62, 1966-67, October 26, 1954, August 27, 1964, 1954, November, 1958, 1st, December, 1958, 1959, July, 1964, year 1959-60, 1,75,509'87, 1959-60, June 10, 1959, January, 1964, 5,63,087, January 23, 1964, the assessment year, year 1960-61, December 23, 1960, March 4, 1964, November, 1958, the previous year, 1959-60, 2,34,197, October 26, 1954, years 1961-62, 1962-63, 1964-65, 1965-66, 1954, the year 1963-64, all these years, every year, these years, the same years, 1958, '1, the years 1961-62 to 1965-66, 1961, the assessment, years 1961-62, 1963-64, years 1962-63, 1964-65, 1965-66, 1966-67, August 27, 1964, 1958, 1959-60, 1960-61, this year, 1982, 1959-60, 1960-61, October 26, 1954, November, 1958, November 17, 1958, the previous year', the year, the year, year, three years, '10, 1973, 1961-62, all these years, 1954, the year ending, between 20th June and 19th July, 1958, 1954, a year, 1959-60, 1960-61, the year, August 27, 1964, 1982, 1959-60, 1960-61, 1231, 1982

CARDINAL:

108, 185, three, 25, 66 2/3, 2,50,000, 2,88,237.77, 2,88,237.77, 12,79,362-04, 2,85,266.01, 77,634, 1,75,510, 17,224, 13,441, 28,022, 60, 1,75,510, 2,42,118, 5, 2, 1,000, 1,300, 6, two, 1,75,510, 2,52,118, 2,50,000, 17,812, 108, 7, 24, one, 1962]46ITR144(SC, 148):'No, two, 1971]82ITR547(SC, 185, 11, 5, two, one, 4, three, 15, 5, 25, three, 1979]120ITR897(Bom, 25, only two, 1981]132ITR144(Delhi, 108, three, 108, 1982:16, 185, 108, 200

ORG:

B.R. & Sons, the Tribunal of Arbitration, Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Tribunal, B.R. Sons, B.R. Sons Ltd., B.R. Sons, ITO, B.R. Sons, ITO, ITO, AAC, M/s B.R. Sons, B.R. Sons, M/s, B.R. Sons, M/s B.R. Sons, AAC, Tribunal, M/s B.R. Sons, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, B.R. Sons, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, CIT v. Shoorji Vallabhdas and Co., Tribunal, Tribunal, Karnani Properties Ltd., CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Bombay High Court, CIT, Favre-Leuba & Co. Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, the Commission of Enquiry, Department, ITO, Department, Department

PERCENT:

5%, 1 1/2%, 66 2/3%

ORDINAL:

9th

LOC:

Central Area, South Asia Industries

GPE:

New Delhi, I.T.R.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //