Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State of U.P. Through Secy. Home Dept. Lucknow and ors. Vs. Jaswant Singh Sarna

Decided On : Apr-22-1968

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Article 226, Section 14(1)(b)(i)(3, the Arms Act, Section 15(3, the Arms Act, the Arms Act, Section 5, the Indian Arms Act, Section 14, Sections 5, Section 18, the Indian Arms Act, Constitution, The Arms Act, The Arms Act, Section 4, Section 3, Section 5, Section 7, Section 2(1)(i, Section 2(1)(h, Section 18, section 13, section 14, Section 13, Chapter II, Section 14(2, Section 14(3, section 3, Chapter II, section 14, Section 17, Section 18, Section 14(1)(b)(i, Section 14, section 14, Section 13, Section 14, Article 19 of the Constitutionare, Article 19, section 14(2, Section 17, Section 14(1)(b)(i, Section 14(1)(b)(1, Section 14(3, section 18, Section 14(1)(b)(i, Section 39, the Calcutta Police Act, the Bengal Excise Act, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(6, Raj 264, Section 18 of the Arms Act, Section 14 of the Arms Act, Section 18, Section 18

LOC: Single

PERSON: Healer, Gorakhpur, Began, Ghanshyam Das Gupta, Cooverjee, District Magistrate, Kishore Singh

ORG: Gorakhpur Arms Corporation, Lucknow, Indian Arms Corporation, the Gorkhpur Arms Corporation, XII, XIII, the Indian Arms Corporation, The State Government, the State Government, respondent3, Broome, the State Government, the State Government, The State of Uttar Pradesh, the British Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Rifle Club, Rifle Association, the Central Government, Rifle Club, Rifle Association, grant--, the Supreme Court, Board of High School and Intermediate Education, AIR 1962, Act, Act, Mineral Development Ltd., State of Bihar, AIR I960 SC 468, AIR 1954 SC 220, Harishanker v. State of, AIR 1961, SC, the State Government, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, AIR 1956 Cal 96, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, AIR 1962, the State Government

CARDINAL: two, 4., 6., 14, 7, two, 8, 1, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 13, 14, 9, 10, 12, 1, 2, 13, 1, 1, two, 1, 380, 14, 15, 16, 705, two, 17, two, two, 18, 19

DATE: August 17, 1964, 1959, August 17, 1964, 1959, 1878, 1959, 1878, 1878, only some years before, 1959, 1878, 1959, three years, 1110, 1955, 1954, 1909, one year, 1878, 1959, 1110

EVENT: the Indian Arms Act

NORP: British, British

GPE: India, India, India, India11, India, Madhya Pradesh, Singh v. State of, Rajasthan, Howrah

FAC: Kishan Chand Arora v. Commissioner of Police

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Kishore

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //